期刊文献+

超高效液相色谱串联质谱法检测食品中蜡样芽孢杆菌呕吐毒素Cereulide 被引量:13

Rapid Quantification of Cereulide,Emetic Toxin of Bacillus Cereus,in Foods by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了快速检测食品中蜡样芽孢杆菌呕吐毒素Cereulide的超高效液相色谱三重四极杆质谱联用分析方法。样品提取液经硅胶和Carb固相萃取柱净化后,以0.1%甲酸-0.2 mmol/L乙酸铵溶液和0.1%甲酸-乙腈溶液作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,在Acquity BEH 300 C18柱上实现分离,正离子ESI-MS/MS MRM方式检测,以13C6-Cereulide作为内标的稳定同位素稀释法进行定量分析。一次进样分析时间为7 min。米饭、添加33%玉米胚油的米饭和婴儿配方奶粉中平均加标回收率分别为85.7%~87.5%,85.3%~110%和94.2%~113%;相对标准偏差为4.6%~13%,5.9%~9.1%和3.4%~6.5%(n=6);定量限为10 ng/kg(S/N=10)。方法灵敏、准确,适合于食品样品中Cereulide的测定,并已成功应用于食物中毒样品的检测。 A rapid UPLC-MS/MS method is described for the quantification of Cereulide,the emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus in foods.After extraction the sample solution was cleaned-up by SiO2 and Carb SPE procedures,the analysis of Cereulide was performed on an Acquity BEH 300 C18 column using gradient elution with 0.1% formic acid in 0.2 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile,and detected by the positive electrospray ionization-MS/MS method under MRM mode,and quantified by a stable isotope dilution method using the 13C6-Cereulide as the internal standard.The cycle time of each analysis was 7.0 min.The average recoveries were 85.7%-87.5%,85.3%-110% and 94.2%-113% for Cereulide in boiled rice,boiled rice supplemented with 33% maize oil and formula baby milk powder with RSDs of 4.6%-13%,5.9%-9.1% and 3.4%-6.5%(n=6),respectively.The limits of quantitation(S/N=10) were 10 ng/kg.The method was sensitive and selective for the detection of Cereulide in food,and has been successfully applied to the measurement of Cereulide in the samples resulting in food poisoning.
出处 《分析化学》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期1267-1273,共7页 Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
关键词 超高效液相色谱串联质谱 蜡样芽孢杆菌 呕吐毒素 食品 Ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; Bacillus cereus Cereulide; Emetic toxin; Food
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Agata N, Mori M, Ohta M, Suwan S, Ohtani I, lsobe M. FEMSMicrobiol. Lett., 1994, 121(1)- 31-34.
  • 2Agata N, Ohta M, Mori M, Isobe M. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. , 1995,129(1): 17-20.
  • 3Mahler H,Pasi A,Kramer J M,Schulte P,Scog.ing A C,Bar W,Kr/ihenbihhl S. N. Engl. J. Med. , 1997, 336(16) : 1142-1148.
  • 4Paananen A, Mikkola R, Sareneva T, Matikainen S, Hess M, Andersson M A, Julkunen I, Salkinoja-Salonen M S, Timonen T. Clin. Exp. Immunol. , 2002, 129(3): 420-428.
  • 5Teplova V V, Mikkola R, Tonshin A A, Saris N E, Salkinoja-Salonen M S. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. , 2006, 210(1) : 39-46.
  • 6TAO Zhi-Yang, LIU Qian, LIU Qing. J. Pub. Healthand Prey. Med. , 2008, 19(5): 47.
  • 7YIN Quan-Xi, ZHANG Xiu-Hong, DU Xin, SHEN Xiao-Hua, CHEN Bin, ZHAO Rui. Chin. Prey. Med. , 2006, 7(2): 115-117.
  • 8LI Min, LI Dong-Guang, WANG Mei-Han, GUO Jian. Chin. J. Public Health, 2007, 23(9): 1116-1117.
  • 9ZHOU Guo-Ping, LIANG Tian-Guang , DING Shu-Juan. Chinese J. Food Hygiene, 2009, 21 (5) : 450-454.
  • 10J/i-iskel/iinen E L, Teplova V V, Andersson M A, Andersson L C, Tammela P, Andersson M C, Pirhonen T I, Saris N E, Vuorela P, Salkinoja-Salonen M S. Toxicol In Vitro. , 21103, 17(5-6) : 737-744.

同被引文献106

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部