期刊文献+

儒家生命伦理视阈下的安乐死 被引量:1

Study of the Euthanasia in Light of the Confucianism Bioethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安乐死的研究者往往强调死得"安乐",但是安乐死首先面对的问题仍然是"生"与"死"的问题,本文从儒家世界观,人生观,价值观方面来探讨安乐死问题,儒家世界观认为"天人一体",在死亡面前,应该坦然接受死亡,这为安乐死研究提供了一个逻辑起点。儒家人生观认为,并非存在持续性的痛苦的患者都可以申请安乐死,只有疾病已阻止到了对人格理想的追求时才可以申请安乐死,并且痛苦不包含精神上的痛苦。生命权的地位问题是安乐死的一个热点问题,儒家价值观认为,生命权并不是绝对神圣的,还对安乐死所附带的功利主义效果予以肯定,虽然这种功利主义效果不能作为实行安乐死的理由。 Even though the researchers tend to put emphasis on the problem of euthanasia while people faces the death, the first and foremost issue concerning euthanasia is always a question of life and death. This paper discussed the Confucianism world view,outlook on life and Values. The Confucianism world view believes that human should integrate themselves with nature, we should calmly accept death when facing the inevitable end, which 15rovides a logic point for the study of euthanasia. Confucians'outlook on life reckon that not all patients with constant agony can apply for euthanasia, and this agony does not include the spiritual sufferings..Only the disease has to stop to the pursuit of an ideal personality you can apply for euthanasia According to the Confucius view, life is not taken as an absolute holy thing. Confucians also confirms the attendant utilitarian effects of euthanasia, even though it cannot be applied for this reason.
出处 《医学与社会》 2012年第8期4-6,共3页 Medicine and Society
基金 河南省卫生厅卫生政策研究课题 编号为YWZY20111023 河南省教育厅省级教改项目 编号为2012SJGLX296
关键词 安乐死 儒家 生命伦理 Euthanasia Confucianism Bioethies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1田甲乐.安乐死:科学与人文的博弈[J].医学与社会,2011,24(12):7-9. 被引量:4
  • 2朱红梅.安乐死的学理辨析[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(11):108-112. 被引量:4
  • 3RoberyYoung.Voluntary Euthanasia [DB/OL].2010-3-2.http:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary.
  • 4LoPing-cheung. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide from Confu- cian Moral Perspectives[J].Dao,2010(9) :53-77.
  • 5Marit Karlssom, Anna Milberg,Peter Strang. Suffering and Eu- thanasia:a qualitative study of dying cancer patients'perspect- ives [J/OL].Supportive in Care Cancer,2011-5-14,http:// china.springerlink.com/content/e616135204573k76/full-text.pdf.
  • 6武永江.论尼采生命哲学视阈的精神痛苦观[J].医学与社会,2011,24(5):1-3. 被引量:2

二级参考文献26

  • 1彭红,李永国.从滑坡现象和风险社会理论看安乐死[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(3):20-23. 被引量:6
  • 2[德] 尼采.论道德的谱系·善恶之彼岸[M].桂林:漓江出版社,2007.
  • 3[德]尼采.人性的,太人性的:一本献给自由精神的书(上卷)[M].魏育青,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008.
  • 4[德]尼采.快乐的科学[M].黄明嘉,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 5[德]尼采.朝霞[M].田立年,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 6[德]尼采.疯狂的意义:尼采超人哲学集[M].周国平,译.天津:天津人民出版社,2007.
  • 7[德]尼采.人性的,太人性的:一本献给自由精神的书(下卷)[M].李晶浩,高天忻,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008.
  • 8时镒 徐西胜.丧葬习俗与殡葬文化.东岳论丛,2001,:75-76.
  • 9Ted Hondcrich. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy(Second Edition)[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 10Robery Young. "Voluntary Euthanasia"[EB/OL]. [2010-06-06]. http://plato.stanford.edu/enlries/Euthanasia-voluntary.

共引文献7

同被引文献32

  • 1王志杰.放弃治疗与安乐死的伦理争论[J].中国医学伦理学,2005,18(4):61-63. 被引量:13
  • 2Bock M, CimTocchi V, Wiedermann CJ. Case involving end-of-lifedecision issues in Italy. Intensive Care Med,2007 ,33 :1041-1042.
  • 3Emanuel EJ. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide : a review of the empirical data from the United States. Arch Intern Med, 2002, 162 : 142-152.
  • 4Hurst SA, Mauron A. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland:allowing a role for non-physicians. BMJ, 2003,326: 27 1 -273.
  • 5Lemaire FJ. A law for end of life care in France? Intensive Care Meal,2004,30:2120.
  • 6Lindblad A, Juth N, Furst CJ, et al. When enough is enough; terminating life-sustaining treatment at the patient' s request: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians and the general public. J Med Ethics, 2010,36:284-289.
  • 7Muller-Busch HC, Oduncu FS, Woskanjan S, et al. Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation-a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine. Med Health Care Philos,2004,7:333-339.
  • 8Zamperetti N, Proietti R. End of life in the ICU : laws, rules and practices:the situation in Italy. Intensive Care Med,2006,32:1620- 1622.
  • 9Mackellar C. Laws and practices relating to euthanasia and assisted suicide in 34 countries of the Council of Europe and the USA. Eur J Health Law,2003,10:63-64.
  • 10Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units:the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med, 1999, 27 : 1626-1633.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部