期刊文献+

部分生化项目不同检测系统测定结果的比对分析和偏倚评估 被引量:10

Comparative analysis and bias assessment on results of partial biochemical items detected by different biochemical testing systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对同一实验室不同检测系统测定结果的比对分析和偏倚评估,探讨各检测系统之间检测结果是否具有可比性。方法:按照NCCLS EP9-A2文件的要求,以检测系统1(X):日立7600全自动生化分析仪P1模块,迈克试剂,c.f.a.s.校准品和BIO RAD质控品作为目标检测系统,检测系统2(Y1)和检测系统3(Y2)作为比较检测系统,在各自系统中通过检测病人新鲜血清天门冬氨酸转氨酶(Aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(Alamine aminotransferase,ALT)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(Gamma-glutamyl transferase,GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(Alkaline phosphatase,ALP)、尿素(Urea)、肌酐(Creatinine,Cr)、尿酸(Uricacid,UA)水平来计算比较检测系统和目标检测系统之间的相对偏差(%SE),以美国临床实验室修正法规(CLIA’88)规定的室间质量评价允许误差范围的1/2为标准,判断各检测系统间测定结果的临床可接受性。结果:各检测系统间检测结果显著相关(r2>0.95),临床可接受性能评价中检测系统2(Y1)Urea低浓度水平时SE%>1/2CLIA’88TEa,与检测系统1(X)不具有可比性,其余各项测定结果偏倚评估临床可接受。结论:除低水平Urea外,AST、ALT、GGT、ALP、Cr、UA检测结果在我院3套检测系统间具有可比性。 Objective:To investigate the comparability among different biochemical testing systems in the same laboratory by performing the comparative analysis and bias estimation on the results.Methods:According to NCCLS document EP9-A2,3 biochemical testing systems including system 2 and 3(Y1-Y2,comparative testing systems) and system 1(X,targeted testing system,which was composed of Hitachi 7600 biochemical analyzer P1,maker reagents,c.f.a.s.calibrator and BIO RAD quality control) were used to obtain correlation coefficient and linear regression equation.The values of aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alamine aminotransferase(ALT),gamma-glutamyl transferase(GGT),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),Urea,creatinine(Cr) and uric acid(UA) in patient’s serum were detected by the three systems.Then the coefficient and the equation were used to evaluate the system bias between comparative testing systems and targeted testing system.The comparability of different testing systems was judged by half of the CLIA’88 standard.Results:The results of the three testing systems were significantly correlated(r2〉0.95).The results of all testing items showed good comparability except those of Urea(with low concentration level) tested by system 2(Y2) and system 1(X)(%SE〉1/2CILA’88 TEa).Conclusions:There is good comparability among the results of AST、ALT、GGT、ALP、Cr、UA detected by different testing systems in our hospital except those of Urea with low concentration level.
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期630-633,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
关键词 比对研究 质量管理 生化分析 comparative study quality management biochemical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1张莺莺,陶青松,浦春,刘春生,宋骏.不同检测系统15项常规生化检测结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学与临床,2011,8(3):257-259. 被引量:20
  • 2International Organization for Standardization IS0/IE17025 Gen- eral Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Labo- ratories[S].Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2005 : 1-28.
  • 3魏吴 丛玉隆.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2004.27-80.
  • 4The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Epq-A Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples;approved guideline-second edition[S].Wayne:The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002 : 1-8.
  • 5张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47

二级参考文献12

  • 1张秀明,庄俊华,徐宁,黄宪章,郑松柏,王建兵,曹永坚,尹一兵.不同检测系统4种心肌酶测定结果的比对与临床可接受性评价[J].临床检验杂志,2005,23(6):404-407. 被引量:34
  • 2张秀明,郑松柏,孙蕾,柯培锋,马骥,张文,林莲英.应用Westgard方法评价决定图判断生化检测系统性能的可接受性[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(1):86-90. 被引量:73
  • 3张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47
  • 4National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[S].Approved Guideline,2nd ed,EP9-A2,2002.
  • 5Siekmann L,Bonora R,Burtis CA,et al.IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C.International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.Part 7.Certification of four reference materials for the determination of enzymatic activity of gamma-glutamyl-transferase,lactate dehydrogenase,alanine amino-transferase and creatine kinase accord[J].Clin Chem Lab Med,2002,40(7):739-745.
  • 6International Organization for Standardization.General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.ISO/IEC 17025[S].International Organization for Standardization,Geneva,1999.
  • 7National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[S].Approved Guideline,2nd ed,EP9-A2,2002.
  • 8Ricos C,Alvarez V,Cava F,et al.Current databases on biological variation:pros,cons and progress[J].Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999,59(7):491-500.
  • 9王红,陈化禹.不同检测系统测定血浆纤维蛋白原结果比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2008,7(4):85-86. 被引量:3
  • 10伊妮,朱晓华.校准品专用性的验证[J].上海医学检验杂志,2002,17(4):244-246. 被引量:12

共引文献144

同被引文献52

引证文献10

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部