期刊文献+

利奈唑胺治疗恶性肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少并发革兰阳性菌感染的疗效观察 被引量:4

Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of neutropenia complicated by gram-positive bacteria infections in malignant tumor patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价利奈唑胺治疗中性粒细胞减少患者并发革兰阳性菌感染的临床疗效与安全性。方法选择62例中性粒细胞减少并发革兰阳性菌感染的恶性肿瘤患者,给予所有患者静脉滴注利奈唑胺600mg、1次/12h,根据治疗情况连续使用7~21d;观察治疗疗效以及患者的不良反应。结果在使用利奈唑胺治疗后,患者临床治愈43例,有效12例,进步2例,无效5例,总有效率为88.71%,药物不良反应总发生率为11.29%。结论利奈唑胺治疗恶性肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少并发革兰阳性菌感染临床疗效确切,不良反应少。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of neutropenia complicated by gram-positive bacteria infections in malignant tumor patients. METHODS A total of 62 neutropenic malignant tumor patients with gram-positive bacteria infections were chosen, all the patients were given the intravenous infusion of linezolid 600 mg for 12h once, this regimen continued for 7 -- 21 d according to the treatment~ the treatment efficacy and the adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS After the treatment with linezolid, 43 patients were cured, 12 patients were effective, 2 cases improved, and 5 patients were ineffective, the total effective rate was 88. 71%, the total incidence of drug adverse reactions was 11. 29%. CONCLUSION Linezolid has significant clinical efficacy and less adverse reactions in treatment of neutropenia complicated by gram:positive bacteria infections in the malignant tumor patients.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第16期3616-3618,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 利奈唑胺 治疗 中性粒细胞减少 革兰阳性菌感染 Linezolid Treatment Neutropenia Gram-positive bacteria infections
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献30

  • 1林东昉,吴菊芳,张婴元,郑经川,缪竞智,郑丽叶,盛瑞媛,周新,沈华浩,吴卫红,周乐,汪复.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗革兰阳性菌感染的随机、双盲、对照、多中心临床试验[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2009,9(1):10-17. 被引量:56
  • 2Jacqueline C,Caillon J,Le Mabecque V,et al. In vitro activity of linezolid alone and in combination with gentamicin, vancomycin or rifampicin against methicillin-resistant Staphflococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2003,51(4) :857-864.
  • 3Solomkin JS, Bjornson HS, Cainzos M, et al. A consensus statement on empiric therapy for suspected Gram-positive infections in surgical patients[J]. Am J Surg, 2004,187 (1) :134-145.
  • 4Drago L,Nicola L,De Vecchi E,et al. A comparative in vitro evaluation of resistance selection after exposure to teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2008,14(6) : 608-611.
  • 5John W,Kamal I, Dennis S, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infeetions [J]. Antimierob Agents Chemother, 2005,49 (6) : 2260-2266.
  • 6Falagas ME, Siempos II, Vardakas KZ. Linezolid versus a glycopeptides or β-lactam for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[ J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2008, 8(1):53-66.
  • 7Cammarata SK, Bennudez M, Golin V, et al. Comparison of linezolid versus ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in the treatment of hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia [ C ]. Program and abstracts of 9th International Congress on Infectious Diseases ,2000, Boston.
  • 8Wunderink RG, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, et al (Linezolid Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group). Continuation of randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vaneomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia[J]. Clin Ther,2003, 25 (3) :980-982.
  • 9Rubinstein E, Cmnmarata SK, Oliphant TH,et al( Linezolid Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group ). Linezolid (PNU- 100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, doubleblind, multicenter study[ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 2001, 32 (3) :402-412.
  • 10Weigeh J, Itani K, Stevens D,et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49 ( 6 ) : 2260- 2266.

共引文献71

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部