期刊文献+

格曼语动词题元结构及在句子中的映射

Thematic Structures of Verbs and the Projection of Thematic Roles in the Geman Language.
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文讨论格曼语动词题元角色的映射机制。认为从话语形式看,动词的题元角色尽管与句子的结构位置并不一一对应,但却存在严整有序的深层对应。文章立足于这种深层对应并充分考虑语用因素的影响,对动词题元角色的映射机制进行描写分析,进而对表层的无序现象作出合理解释。 In this paper, we address the problems of the projection mechanism of verbs in the Geman language. First of all, we give a brief description of thematic structures of verbs and outline the configuration of unmarked sentences in this language. It is then argued that, although a one-to-one correspondence does not exist between the thematic roles and the positions of sentential configuration at the surface level, at the deep level certain thematic roles are strictly and regularly projected into the correlative positions of sentential configuration. In light of such deep correspondence and pragmatic factors involved, we may attempt a concise description of and analysis on the projection mechanism of verbs in the Geman language, which will consequently facilitate a valid and effective explanation of some surface aberrant phenomena.
作者 吕佳 李大勤
出处 《民族语文》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期13-22,共10页 Minority Languages of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1顾阳.论元结构理论介绍[J].当代语言学,1994(1):1-11. 被引量:113
  • 2李大勤.“关系化”对“话题化”的影响——汉语话题结构个案分析[J].当代语言学,2001,3(2):127-131. 被引量:6
  • 3李大勤:《格曼语研究》,民族出版社,2003年.
  • 4李大勤:《现代汉语单向动词句的结构格局及其生成机制》,载云贵彬主编.《语言学名家讲座》,中国传媒大学出版社,2006年.
  • 5孙宏开、陆绍尊、张济川、欧阳觉亚:《门巴、珞巴、僮人的语言》,中国社会科学出版社,1980年.
  • 6徐烈炯,沈阳.题元理论与汉语配价问题[J].当代语言学,1998(3):1-21. 被引量:74
  • 7袁毓林:《现代汉语名词的配价研究》,《中国社会科学》1991年第2期.
  • 8Dowty, D..- Thematic Proto-Roles andArgument-Selection. Language. 1991, 67:547-619.
  • 9Li, Ying-che.- Problems of Subject ,Object, etc. in Chinese Grammar. In Linguistics in Honor ofA. A. Hil1,109-32. C. Tang, J. Tung, and A. Wu (eds.) Taipei: Rainbow Bridge Book Co., 1972.
  • 10孙宏开、陆绍尊、张济川、欧阳觉亚:《门巴、珞巴、位人的语言》,中国社会科学出版社,1980年.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968.A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • 2Chomky, N. 1977. On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, eds., Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
  • 3Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logic relations in Chinese and theory of grammar. PhD dissertation. Cambridge,Massachusetts: MIT.
  • 4Huang, C.-T. James. 1986. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 5Lasnik, H., and J. Uriagereka. 1988.A Course GB Syntax: Lectures on Binding and Empty Categories. Cambridge,Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • 6Li, Charles N, and Sandra A. Tompson. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charels N, Li.,ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 1976: 457-489.
  • 7Xu, Liejiong and D. Terence Langedoen. 1985. Topic structure in Chinese. Language 61:1-27.
  • 8徐烈炯主编.《共性与个性--汉语语言学中的争议》1-33.北京:北京语言文化大学出版社.
  • 9徐烈炯,刘丹青.1997,《话题的结构和功能》.上海:上海教育出版社.

共引文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部