期刊文献+

非线性定价的福利再分配效应研究——基于非对称双寡头市场的分析 被引量:1

A Study of Welfare Redistribution Effect of Nonlinear Pricing:Based on An Analysis of the Asymmetric Duopoly Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 较之"线性定价","非线性定价"在社会福利方面的优势被现有理论反复证明。在肯定"非线性定价"方式能够改进社会总福利的同时,指出并不是每一个市场主体的福利水平都能够通过"非线性定价"方式得到改进。通过建立模型、计算和比较分析,提出了在上述两种情况下,"非线性定价"可能会对特定的市场主体产生"福利剥夺",从而出现福利再分配效应。 Compared with linear pricing, the advantages of nonlinear pricing in the area of social welfare have been proved repeatedly in the existing theory. While confirming that the nonlinear pricing can improve the social welfare, this paper points out that not all market entities can get a welfare improvement through nonlinear pricing. By establishing models to calculate and analyzes, we propose that "welfare deprivation" may be found in some specific market entities by the nonlinear pricing in the above mentioned two different kinds of situations, which may lead to the welfare redistribution effect.
作者 陈富良 徐涛
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期13-23,共11页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
关键词 非线性定价 非对称性双寡头垄断 福利再分配 nonlinear pricing asymmetric duopoly market welfare redistribution effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1丹尼尔·史普博.管制与市场[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1999.26-39.
  • 2Clarkson, K. W., R. L. Miller. Industrial Organization: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982.
  • 3Joseph, S. DeSalvo, Mobinul Huq. Introducing Nonlinear Pricing into Consumer Choice Theory[J]. The Journal of Economic Education, 2002, 33(2): 166-179.
  • 4Mark Armstrong, John Vickers. Competitive Nonlinear Pricing and Bundling[R]. Economics Series Working Papers 281, University of Oxford, Department of Economics, 2006.
  • 5Goldman, M., H. Leland, D. Sibley. Optimal Non-uniform Prices[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1984, 51: 305-319.
  • 6Maskin, E., J. Riley. Monopoly with Incomplete Information[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1984, 15: 171-196.
  • 7Stole, L.. Nonlinear Pricing and Oligopoly[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1995, 4(4): 529-562.
  • 8Yin, X.. Two-part Tariff Competition in Duopoly[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(6): 799-820.
  • 9Thanassoulis, J.. Competitive Mixed Bundling and Consumer Surplus[J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2007, 16(2): 437-467.
  • 10陈富良,徐涛.基于非线性定价的消费量陷阱模型及其扩展[J].中国工业经济,2011(8):119-127. 被引量:3

二级参考文献50

  • 1刘玉勋.消费量陷阱与非线性定价模型的改进——以全球通和神州行为例[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(1):90-98. 被引量:2
  • 2姜正新.我国电信产业不对称双限资费规制模式[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006,26(3):55-60. 被引量:2
  • 3汪贵浦,沈怡.我国垄断性行业高收入的成因与形成机理分析[J].经济论坛,2007(8):35-38. 被引量:3
  • 4Katz M. Price Discrimination and Monopolistic Competition [ J ]. Econometrica, 1984, (52) : 1453 - 1471.
  • 5Borenstein S. Price Discrimination in Free - Entry Markets[ J ]. Rand Joumal of Economics, 1985, (16) : 380 - 397.
  • 6Hotelling H. Stability in Competition [ J ]. Economic Journal, 1929, ( 39 ) :41 - 57.
  • 7Thise J F,Vives X. On the Strategic Choice of Spatial Price Policy[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, (78): 122 -137.
  • 8Stole L. Nonlinear Pricing and Oligopoly[ J ]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1995, (4): 529 -562.
  • 9Mark Armstrong,John Vickers. Competitive Price Discrimination[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics,2001,32(4): 579 -605.
  • 10Jean - Charles Rochet, Lars A Stole. Nonlinear Pricing with Random Participation [ J ]. The Review of Economic Studies,2002,69 ( 1 ) : 277 - 311.

共引文献24

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部