期刊文献+

中国本土会计师事务所的市场地位与经济回报 被引量:17

Market Position of Chinese Local Audit Firms and Associated Economic Return
原文传递
导出
摘要 区域规模化和行业专长化是会计师事务所通常采取的两种发展战略。本文分析和比较了具有区域市场领先地位以及具有行业市场领先地位的中国本土会计师事务所伴随的经济回报(以审计定价度量)。基于全样本的证据显示:本土会计师事务所仅仅通过在各省际市场取得领先地位并不足以获取明显的经济回报;具备行业市场领先地位则伴随着显著更高的经济回报;同时具备行业市场领先地位和区域市场领先地位则伴随着更大的经济回报。进一步的分析显示,不同本土会计师事务所可能需要考虑在发展战略及其实现途径上的差异化。本文的发现对本土会计师事务所制定符合自身特征的发展战略具有启示意义。 Regional expansion and industry specialization are two strategies that audit firms commonly adopt for organizational development. This study investigates the economic return (proxied by audit fees) associated with Chinese local audit firms who are a provincial audit market leader or an industry leader. The evidence based on the full sample indicates that: (1) local audit firms who are only a provincial market leader but not an industry leader do not earn a significant audit fee premium, (2) local audit firms who are an industry leader earn a significant fee premium, and (3) local audit firms who are both a provincial market leader and an industry leader earn even a greater fee premium. Additional analysis shows that, for different local audit firms (in terms of their national-level size), regional expansion and industry specialization have differential effects on the audit fee premium. Our findings have implications for Chinese local audit firms to establish strategies that help to increase economic returns.
作者 吴溪 张俊生
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期80-88,97,共9页 Accounting Research
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0754) 中央财经大学青年科研创新团队项目 北京市教育委员会共建项目 中央财经大学"211工程"重点学科建设项目资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1韩洪灵,陈汉文.会计师事务所的行业专门化是一种有效的竞争战略吗?--来自中国审计市场的经验证据[J].审计研究,2008(1):53-60. 被引量:66
  • 2Chan, K. H. , K. Z. Lin, and P. Mo. 2006. A political - economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies , 11 (1) : 21 ~48.
  • 3Craswe11, A. T. , and J. R. Francis. 1999. Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: A Test of Competing Theories. The Accounting Review , 74 (2) : 201 -216.
  • 4Gramling, A. A. , and D. N. Stone. 2001. Audit Firm Industry Expertise: A Review and Synthesis of the Archival Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature , 20 : 1 ~ 29.
  • 5Habib, A. 2011. Audit Firm Industry Specialization and Audit Outcomes: Insights from Academic Literature. Research in Ac- counting Regulation, 23 ( 1 ) : llg - 129.
  • 6Hay, D. C. , W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees : a meta - analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research , 23 ( 1 ) : 141 - i91.
  • 7Pearson, T. , and G. Trompeter. 1994. Competition of Market for Audit Serv!ce: The Effect of Supplier Concentration on Audit Fee. Contemporary Accounting Research , 11 ( 1 ) : 115 - 135.
  • 8Simunic, D. 1980. The Pricing of Audit Services: Theoryand Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research , 18 ( 1 ) : 161 - 190.
  • 9Wang, Q. , T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2008. State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46 (1) : 112 -134.

二级参考文献22

  • 1余玉苗.行业知识、行业专门化与独立审计风险的控制[J].审计研究,2004(5):63-67. 被引量:85
  • 2耿建新,房巧玲.我国会计师事务所规模研究——基于审计市场经验数据的聚类分析[J].会计研究,2005(3):22-27. 被引量:62
  • 3波特.1997.陈小悦译.《竞争优势》.华夏出版社.
  • 4Bell et al. , 1997, “Auditing Organizations Through a Strategy- System Lens”, NY - KPMG.
  • 5Carcello et al. , 1992, “Audit Quality Attributes : The Perception of Audit Partner,Preparers and Financial Statement Users” ,Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11:1-15.
  • 6Casterella et al. , 2004, “Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Pricing” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23:123-140.
  • 7Craswell et al. , 1995. “Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry specialization”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (December) :97-322.8.
  • 8De Belde, 1997,“An Exploratory Investigation of Industry Specialization of Large Accounting Firms”, International Journal of Accounting 32 : 337-355.
  • 9DeAngelo, 1981, “The Auditor-Client Contractual Relationship: An Economic Analysis” ,Michigan:UMI Research Press.
  • 10DeFond et al. , 2000,“Auditor Industry specialization and Market Segmentation:Evidence from Hong Kong”, Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory 19:49-66.

共引文献65

同被引文献161

二级引证文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部