期刊文献+

“经济人”分析范式内含的理性悖论——长远利益、为己利他与行为理性的理解 被引量:16

Rationality Paradox Inherent in the Analytical Paradigm of Economic Man:Long-tem Interest,Benefiting-oneself-and-benefiting-others and the Understanding of Behavioral Rationality
原文传递
导出
摘要 "经济人"分析范式在理性概念的使用上存在明显的逻辑悖论:基于行为功利主义的定义以及由此展开的行为分析,实质上使用的是有限理性,而在理性模型的构建和宏观经济的分析上实际使用的却是完全理性。正是由于在不同场合所使用理性内涵存在如此的不一致,现代主流经济学对短期的行为评价和长期的现象预测之间就出现了断裂。而且,现代主流经济学试图用"无形的手"将两者沟通起来,却一直无法说明"无形的手"是如何运作的。相反,基于长期利益的实现程度和"为己利他"行为机理的实施程度这一视域,可以更好地区别有限理性和完全理性这两个概念,可以更好地认识现实生活中各种行为的理性程度,从而理解社会中不同程度的合作现象。 There exists a obvious logic paradox in the use of the concept of rationality under the analytical paradigm of economic man: it essentially employs bounded rationality to make the definition based on behavioral utilitarianism and corresponding behavioral analysis, but actually employs complete rationality to construct rational model and make macro-eco- nomic analysis. Owing to the inconsistence in the use of the concept of rationality, there is a fracture between short-term behavioral evaluation and long-term phenomenon predication in modern mainstream economics. Moreover, modern mainstream economics tries to combine them by invisible hand, but cannot provide an explanation about how invisible hand works. On the contrary, the analysis from the perspective of the achievement of long-term interests and the enforcement of the behavioral mechanism of benefiting oneself and benefiting others can effectively distinguish bounded rationality from complete rationality and recognize the rational degrees of behavior in real life, thereby understanding the cooperation in the society.
作者 朱富强
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期10-17,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"新时期中国民生保障体系建设研究"(项目批准号:10zd&038)
关键词 有限理性 完全理性 理性悖论 经济人 为己利他 bounded rationality complete rationality rationality paradox economic man benefiting oneself and benefiting others
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Dow, S. C. 2002. Pluralism in Economics. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Institutional and Political Economics, 29 November, p. 7.
  • 2普特南.2006年.《事实与价值二分法的崩溃》,应奇译,东方出版社.
  • 3McKelvey R. D. & Palfrey T. R. 1992, An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica, 60 (4) : 803--836.
  • 4Rosemarie Nagel. 1995, Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. American Economic Re- view, 85, (5): 1313--1326.
  • 5List J. A. 2004, Young, Selfish and Male: Field Evidence of Social Preferences. The Economic Journal, 114 (January): 121--149.
  • 6Stephens W. , Mclinn C. M. & Stevens J. R. 2002, Discounting and Reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Science, 298: 2216--2218.
  • 7Fehr E. &. Zych P. K. 1998, Do Addicts Behave Rationally? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100(3): 643--662.
  • 8谢林.《承诺的策略》,王永钦,薛峰译,上海世纪出版集团2009年版,第79页.
  • 9Viscusi W. K. 1992. Smoking: Making the risky decision. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Slovic P. , Finucane M. , Peters E. & MacGregor D. G. 2002, Rational actors or rational fools: Implica- tions of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics,31:329--342.

二级参考文献43

  • 1Robert Slonim, Gender Selection Discrimination: Evidence from a Trust Game, Working Paper, Case Western Reserve University, September, 2004.
  • 2Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brailas-Garza & Luis M. Millerl, 2008, Moral Distance in Dictator Games, Judgment and Decision Making, No. 3, pp. 344-354.
  • 3Stigler, G. , "The Development of Utility Theory," The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 58, No. 4, 1950, pp. 307-327.
  • 4古尔德.《马克思的社会本体论:马克思社会实在理论中的个性和共同体》,王学虎译,北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009年,第15页.
  • 5何梦笔.《演化经济学的本体论基础》,载多普菲编.《演化经济学》,贾根良等译,北京:高等教育出版社,2004年,第82-127页.
  • 6Cohen, Jessica L. & William T. Dickens, "A Foundation for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2002, pp. 335-338.
  • 7Andreoni, James, Brian Erard, Jonathan Feinstein, "Tax Compliance," Journal of Economic Literature , Vol. 36, No. 2, 1998, pp. 818-860.
  • 8Mueller, Dennis C. , Public Choice lii, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, eh. 18.
  • 9Kahneman, D. , Knetsch, J. L & Thaler, R. , "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, Vlo. 76, 1986, pp. 728-741.
  • 10Fehr, E. , Kirchsteiger, G. & Riedl, A. , "Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation," Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics, Vol. 107, 1993, pp. 437-460.

共引文献166

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部