期刊文献+

中国儿童青少年身体攻击的发生状况:基于潜在类别分析的结果 被引量:6

Prevalence of Physical Aggression in Chinese Adolescents: Based on Latent Class Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:了解中国儿童青少年身体攻击的发生状况。方法:利用中国儿童青少年心理发育特征调查数据库,对23753名中国4—9年级学生的身体攻击进行潜在类别分析,并对不同身体攻击类别在不同性别和年级内的分布进行差异检验。结果:①4—9年级学生的身体攻击分为三个潜在类别:高发组、边缘组和低发组,比例分别为:5.2%、36.7%、58.1%;②男生高发组、边缘组的比例(4.5%、44.6%)显著高于女生(1.9%、22.8%);③4—9年级学生高发组的比例在6.8%-1.4%,呈现随年级升高而下降的趋势,边缘组的比例在30.2%-37.0%。结论:身体攻击可以分为三类,每个类别在不同性别和年级内部的分布不同。 Objective: To investigate the prevalence of physical aggression in Chinese adolescents. Methods: The data used in this study were from database of the National Children' s Study of China (NCSC). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore types of physical aggression of 23,753 students in fourth-to-ninth-grade, and Percentage Difference Test was employed to investigate the difference of frequency in different gender and grade. Results: (1)According to LCA, fourth-to-ninth-grade students' physical aggression could be divided into three groups, namely, High-risk group, Medium-risk group, low-risk group, the prevalence were 5.2%, 36.7%, 5g.1%, respectively. (2)The prevalence of High-risk group and Medium-risk group of boys(4.5%,44.6%) was significantly higher than girls(1.9%, 22.8%). (3)Within fourth-toninth-grade, the prevalence of High-risk group was 1.4% to 6.8%, showing a decline with the increasing of grade, and the prevalence of Medium-risk group was 30.2% to 37.0%. Conclusion: Physical aggression can be classified into three different types; The prevalences of each type is different in different gender and grade.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期559-561,563,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家科技基础性工作专项重点项目(2006FY110400)
关键词 身体攻击 中国儿童青少年 潜在类别分析 Physical aggression Chinese adolescents Latent class analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Parke RD, Slaby RG. The development of aggression. Hand- book of Child Psychology, 1983, 4:547-641.
  • 2Underwood MK, Galenand BR, Paquette JA. Top ten chal- lenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? Social Development, 2001, 10(2): 248-266.
  • 3Kokko K, Pulkkinen L. Aggression in childhood and long- term unemployment in adulthood: A cycle of maladaptation and some protective factors. Developmental Psychology, 2000, 36(4): 463-472.
  • 4Hawker DSJ, Boulton MJ. Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-ana- lytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psy- chology and Psychiatry, 2000, 41(4): 441-455.
  • 5余毅震,史俊霞,黄艳,王俊.家庭因素与儿童青少年攻击行为关系探讨[J].中国学校卫生,2005,26(10):811-813. 被引量:39
  • 6袁媛,赵静波,张柏芳.广州市1010名儿童行为问题及其影响因素分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(3):359-361. 被引量:28
  • 7Card NA, Stucky BD, Sawalani GM, et al. Direct and indi- rect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta- analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 2008, 79(5): 1155-1229.
  • 8Toldos MP. Sex and age differences in self-estimated phys- ical, verbal and indirect aggression in Spanish adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 2005, 31(l): 13-23.
  • 9周宗奎,蔡春凤,赵冬梅.不同攻击/受欺负类别儿童的同伴交往自我知觉[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(2):23-28. 被引量:9
  • 10Lee KH, Baillargeon RH, Vermunt JK, et al. Age differ- ences in the prevalence of physical aggression among 5- 11-year-old Canadian boys and girls. Aggressive Behavior, 2007, 33(1): 26-37.

二级参考文献82

共引文献284

同被引文献82

引证文献6

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部