期刊文献+

卡泊芬净经验性治疗白血病并发真菌感染的临床疗效分析与评价 被引量:7

Efficacy of caspofungin in empirical treatment of fungal infections patients with leukemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估卡泊芬净经验性治疗白血病并发真菌感染的疗效分析及不良反应。方法选择2009年1月-2011年10月医院白血病并发真菌感染的50例患者,分为卡泊芬净及伊曲康唑两组,每组25例,卡泊芬净组给予卡泊芬净经验性治疗,伊曲康唑组给予伊曲康唑抗真菌治疗,两组治疗时间均持续至体温恢复正常后5d或疗程达14d或连续痰涂片阴性后3d;对两种药物的疗效和不良反应进行观察和评价。结果卡泊芬净和伊曲康唑在治疗白血病并发真菌感染中,总有效率分别为88.0%和64.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组比较后发现,卡泊芬净较伊曲康唑不良反应少,耐受性好。结论在白血病并发真菌感染的治疗中,卡泊芬净较伊曲康唑疗效更好,不良反应更少,患者耐受性更好,是治疗白血病并发真菌感染安全有效的药物。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of caspofungin in treatment of fungal infections patients with leukemia and the adverse reactions. METHODS A total of 50 leukemia patients with fungal infections who received caspofungin or itraconazole for treatment were divided into the caspofungin group and the itraconazole group with 25 patients in each, the treatment continued until 5 days after the body temperature returned back to normal, or the course reached to 14 days or the sputum smear were negative for 3 consecutive days; the efficacy of the two drugs and the adverse reactions were observed and the evaluated. RRESULTS In the treatment of leukemia with fungal infections by using caspofungin and itraconazole, the total effective rates were 88.0% and 64.0%, respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05), this study found that caspofungin had less adverse reactio'ns than did the itraconazole with good tolerance. CONCLUSION Caspofungin, with less adverse reaction and better tolerance to the patients, is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of leukemia patients with fungal infections.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第15期3360-3361,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 卡泊芬净 伊曲康唑 白血病 真菌感染 Caspofungin Itraconazole Leukemia Fungal infections
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈善龙.深部真菌感染的诊治进展[J].中国热带医学,2006,6(4):704-705. 被引量:5
  • 2侵袭性肺部真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(草案)[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(8):697-700. 被引量:866
  • 3徐建国,徐敏,潘娅静.卡泊芬净治疗严重肺部真菌感染临床疗效观察[J].海峡药学,2007,19(7):70-72. 被引量:6
  • 4Walsh TJ,Teppler H,Donowitz GR,et al.Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia[J].N Engl J Med,2004,351(14):1391-1402.
  • 5Pagano L Caira M,Nosari A,et al.The use and efficacy of empirical versus pre-emptive therapy in the management of fungal infections:the HEMA e-chart project[J].Haematologica,2011,96(9):1366-1370.
  • 6Yamaguchi M,Kurokawa T,Ishiyama K,et al.Efficacy and safety of micafungin as an empirical therapy for invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic disorders:a multicenter,prospective study[J].Ann Hematol,2011,90(10):1209-1217.
  • 7Ripeau JS,Aumont F,Belhumeur P,et al.Effect of the echinocandin caspofungin on expression of Candida albicans secretory aspartyl proteinases and phospholipase in vitro[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002,46(9):3096-3100.
  • 8Hope WW,Shoham S,Walsh TJ.The pharmacology and clinical use of caspofungin[J].Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol,2007,3(2):263-274.
  • 9Walsh TJ,Adamson PC,Seibel NL,et al.Pharmacokinetics,safety,and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2005,49(11):4536-4545.
  • 10Sanz-Rodriguez C,Lopez-Duarte M,Jurado M,et al.Safety of the concomitant use of caspofungin and cyclosporin A in patients with invasive fungal infections[J].Bone Marrow Transplant,2004,34(1):13-20.

共引文献15

同被引文献48

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部