亲密关系冲突应对方式量表的修订及信效度检验

Reliability and validity of the romantic partner conflict scale in Chinese people

目的修订中文版亲密关系冲突应对方式量表并检验其在中国群体中的信效度。方法通过翻译和回译以及专家评审和预实验的方法形成原始的中文量表,对223名中国已婚被试进行测量,完成量表的条目筛选和探索性因素分析,确定正式的中文量表。然后在454名中国已婚被试中施测以检验中文量表的信效度。对其中78名被试在1个月后再次施测,考察重测信度。结果探索性因素分析表明,中文版亲密关系冲突应对方式量表由7个因子构成,可解释的总变异率为60.887%,与原版量表的6因子结构存在差异。经过验证性因素分析发现中文量表的6因子模型比7因子模型拟合的更好,并结合专家意见最终确定中文版量表包含妥协、控制、顺从、分离、回避和行为反应共6个因子,30个条目。各因子的Cronbach’sα系数、分半信度系数和重测信度系数分别为0.604～0.872、0.613～0.808、0.611～0.672,均达到统计学意义。结论中文版亲密关系冲突应对方式量表具有较好的信、效度,可以用于评估中国夫妻的冲突应对行为。

Objective To revise the Romantic Partner Conflict Scale into chinese version and to examine its reliability and validity in Chinese people. Methods Translation and back-translation, expert assessment and preexperiment were used to work out the original Chinese version of the Romantic Partner Conflict Scale. 223 married Chinese subjects were assessed to select items and to perform the exploratory factor analysis to work out the formal Chinese version. Then additionally, 454 married Chinese people were assessed to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. The retest reliability was tested in 77 subjects 1 month later. Results Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the Chinese version of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale consisted of 7 factors explaining 60. 887% of the total variance, which was different from its 6-factor English version. However, confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 6-factor Chinese version was better than 7-factor Chinese version in model fitting. Therefore, the Chinese version of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale was finally decided to consist of 30 items and 6 factors including compromise, domination, submission, avoidance, separation and interactional reactivity. The Cronbach＇ s a, split-half reliability and retest reliability of the Chinese version were 0. 604 - 0. 872, 0. 613 - 0. 808 and 0.611 - 0. 672 respectively, all of which had statistical significance. Conclusion The Chinese version of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the conflict resolution behavior in Chinese couples.