期刊文献+

上下游企业研发费用分担与一体化的比较分析 被引量:7

Comparative Analysis of Cost Sharing and Vertical Integration between Upsteam Firms and Downstream Firms
原文传递
导出
摘要 比较分析上下游企业合作研发的费用分担与一体化的个体效益与社会效益,与横向企业研发合作的信息共享形式不同,上下游企业之间研发合作的基本形式是费用分担。建立了一个上游垄断企业和两个下游企业的产业组织理论模型,其中下游企业进行成本降低型生产技术的研究与开发,上游企业有两种选择:一是分担其中一个下游企业的研发费用或是进行纵向并购实现一体化。通过比较上下游研发费用分担与上下游纵向一体化两种情况下的企业利润之和以及全社会研发水平等总体效益,判断上游企业是应该选择纵向并购还是选择分担下游企业的研发费用,以及政府对两种情况下全社会总的研发水平变化进行分析,确定哪种情况下更能改进总的社会福利水平,对于类似的企业纵向并购行为应该鼓励还是限制。 This paper studies the cost sharing of cooperation R&D between upsteam firms and downstream firms. Unlike the information sharing of horizontal cooperation, the basic form of vertical cooperation is cost sharing. For a simple market structure that includes of two downstream enterprises and a monopoly upstream enterprise, downstream firms choose their level of cost-reducing R&D. The upstream firm has two choices: sharing one downstream firm' s R&D costs or vertical integration. The total profits under cost sharing R&D and vertical integration were compared. Through examining the changes of total R&D level under two cases, this study clarifies under which case can improve the level of social welfare can be improved. This study provides reference for a decision-making of cooperation R&D firms.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期36-42,共7页 Systems Engineering
关键词 产业组织理论 供应链合作研发 博弈论 纵向并购 研发溢出 Industrial Organization Theory Research and Development Management Game Theory Vertical Merger R&D Spillovers
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献43

  • 1艾凤义,侯光明.纵向研发合作中的收益分配和成本分担机制[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):86-90. 被引量:46
  • 2Novak S, Eppinger S. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain [ J ]. Management Science, 2001, 47 ( 1 ) : 189 - 204.
  • 3Ulrich KT, Ellison D. Beyond make-buy: Internalization and integration of design and production. The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA. Working Paper: 1998.
  • 4Gupta S, Loulou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure : Strategic incentives in a duopoly [ J ]. Marketing Science,1998,17(4) : 301 - 316.
  • 5Gilbert S, Cvsa K. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,150(3) : 17 - 639.
  • 6Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan VV. Managing technology uncertainty under multi-Firm new product development. University of Texas at Austin, Department of Information, Working paper,2005.
  • 7Spekman RE. Strategic supplier selection: Understanding long-term buyer relationships [ J ]. Business Horizons, 1988,31 (4) : 75 - 81.
  • 8Doyle M. Strategic purchasing can make-or-break a firm[J].Electronic Business, 1989,20(3) : 46 - 48.
  • 9Choi TY, Hartley JL. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain[J]. Operations Management, 1996, 14(4) : 333 - 343.
  • 10Iyer AV, Bergen ME. Quick response in manufacturer retailer channels[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4) : 559 - 570.

共引文献97

同被引文献115

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部