期刊文献+

基于响应面方法的车辆多目标协同优化 被引量:19

Multi-objective collaborative optimization of vehicle based on response surface methodology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立包含7个子系统的某整车动力学仿真模型,以整车的操纵稳定性和行驶平顺性达到最佳匹配为目标,整车的悬架刚度和减震器的阻尼以及稳定杆的扭转刚度为优化变量,在ADAMS/CAR环境下进行仿真。根据中国汽车行业标准QC/T 480—1999和GB/T 4970—2006,分别以操纵稳定性的4个闭环评价指标和平顺性的随机路面评价指标的综合计分为目标函数,以相应计分的最大、最小值作为约束函数建立协同优化的数学模型。然后采用中心复合试验方法设计59组试验,根据实验数据,运用响应面方法(RSM)拟合出回归模型,得到最优值。仿真结果表明该优化方法使汽车的综合计分提高了13%,操纵稳定性和平顺性同时得到优化。 The full vehicle dynamics virtual prototype which included 7 subsystems was established to simulate using ADAMS/CAR, with the best match between handling stability and the ride comfort performance of the car as the object, taking the stiffness and damping of the suspension, the torsion stiffness of anti-roll bar as the optimization variables. According to the Chinese automotive industry standard QC/T 480--1999 and GB/T 4970--2006, it built the corresponding mathematic model of collaborative optimization which used the total score of the comprehensive evaluation indexes include of the four closed-loop handling stability and ride comfort evaluation of random road as the objective function, used the maximum or the minimum score as a constraint function. Then 59 groups test was designed using central composite test method and the total score was estimated by using response surface methodology (RSM). Optimization result of design factors shows that the total score of the full vehicle improves by 13%, and handling stability and the ride comfort performance both are improved.
出处 《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期2586-2592,共7页 Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50975083) 湖南省科技重大专项计划项目(2010FJ1003)
关键词 操纵稳定性 平顺性 协同优化 响应面方法 handling stability riding comfort collaborative optimization RSM
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1海贵春.某智能四驱SUV动力学性能分析与优化研究[D].长沙:湖南大学机械与动载工程学院.2008:37-116.
  • 2吕征,谷正气,赵荣远,李伟平,龚旭.基于响应面方法的汽车操纵稳定性优化[J].系统仿真学报,2009,21(24):7961-7964. 被引量:4
  • 3Sobieski J S, Kodiyalam S, Yang R Y. Optimization of car body under constrains of noise, vibration, and harshness(NVH), and crash[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 22(4): 295-306.
  • 4Uys P E. Criteria for handling measurement[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2006, 43: 43-67.
  • 5Uys P E. Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles traveling on roads with different roughness and speeds[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2006, 18: 1-13.
  • 6Craig K, Stander N, Dooge D, et al. MDO of automotive vehicle for crashworthiness and NVH using response surface methods[C]//The 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 2002: AIAA-2002-5607.
  • 7郑军.新概念车操纵稳定性与舒适性研究[D].长沙:湖南大学机械与运载工程学院,2007:52-110.
  • 8杨荣山,袁仲荣,黄向东,赵克刚,陈金华.基于近似模型的车辆操纵稳定性及平顺性的优化研究[J].汽车技术,2009(7):18-22. 被引量:10
  • 9王娅,谷正气,李伟平,梁小波,彭国谱.基于响应面方法的某智能SUV平顺性优化[J].机械科学与技术,2010,29(3):373-378. 被引量:6
  • 10海贵春,谷正气,骆军,吴彤峰,向宇.某SUV车稳态转向特性分析与优化[J].系统仿真学报,2009,21(7):2068-2071. 被引量:2

二级参考文献33

共引文献24

同被引文献139

引证文献19

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部