期刊文献+

利用扩增片段长度多态性分析鉴别炭疽和蜡样芽孢杆菌 被引量:1

Identification of the Bacillus anthracis and B.cereus Using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分析建立鉴别炭疽芽孢杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌的分子生物学方法。方法:3株炭疽芽孢杆菌和3株蜡样芽孢杆菌基因组经限制性内切酶EcoRⅠ和MseⅠ酶切后与对应接头连接,通过预扩增和选择性扩增获得特异性DNA片段,将片段进行毛细管电泳,并利用GeneScan和BioNumerics软件对电泳数据进行分析。结果:选择性扩增最佳引物组合为EcoRⅠ-G/MseⅠ-A,其扩增片段在100~500 bp范围内的有效数量为40~50条;比较炭疽芽孢杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌的AFLP特征峰值图和DNA指纹图谱,确定了5个有明显差异的片段区。结论:利用AFLP分析可对芽孢杆菌属中相近的炭疽芽孢杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌进行鉴别,该方法可作为炭疽芽孢杆菌传统鉴定方法的补充。 Objective: To identify the Bacillus anthracis and B.cereus by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis. Methods: 3 different isolates of B.anthracis and 3 different isolates of B.cereus were used in this study. The genomic DNA was digested with EcoR I and Mse 2, and the resulting fragments were ligated to double-stranded adapters. The digested and ligated DNA was then pre-amplified and selective-amplified by PCR. The samples were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3100 and the AFLP profiles were analyzed using GeneScan and BioNumerics analysis software. Results: The best-quality primer combinations was EcoR I-G/Mse I-A, the AFLP fingerprint for an isolate was represented by about 40-50 fragments between 100 and 500 bp, and there had 5 visible specific markers between B.anthracis and B.cereus strains in AFLP fingerprint. Conclusion: The B.anthracis and B.cereus isolates were identified by AFLP analysis and this molecular biology method could application with the classical biology method.
出处 《生物技术通讯》 CAS 2012年第4期546-549,共4页 Letters in Biotechnology
关键词 炭疽芽孢杆菌 蜡样芽孢杆菌 扩增片段长度多态性 DNA指纹图谱 Bacillus anthracis Bacillus cereus amplified fragment length polymorphism DNA fingerprint
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 1995,23(21): 4407-4414.
  • 2Keirn P, Kalif A, Schupp J, et al. Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers[J]. J Bacteriol, 1997,179(3): 818-824.
  • 3Ryu C, Lee K, Hawng H J, et al. Molecular characterization of Korean Bacillus anthracis isolates by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and multilocus variable-number tandem repeal analysis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005,71(8): 4664-4671.
  • 4Radnedge L, Agron P G, Hill K K, et al. Genome differences thai distinguish Bacillus anthracis from Bacillus cereus and Bacillus Ihuringiensis[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003,69 (5):2755-2764.
  • 5Ash C, Farrow J A, Dorsch M, et al. Comparative analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis of reverse Iranscriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA[J]. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 1991,41 (3):343-346.
  • 6Bourque S N, Valero J R, Lavoie M C, et al. Comparative analysis of the 16S to 23S ribosomal inlergenic spacer sequences of Bacillus thuringiensis strains and subspecies and of closely related species[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995,61 (4):1623-1626.
  • 7Jackson P J, Hill K K, Laker M T, et al. Cenetic comparison of Bacillus anthracis and its close relatives using amplified fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaclion analysis[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 1999,87(2):263-269.
  • 8Ticknor L O, Kolsto A B, Hill K K, et al. Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of Norwegian Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis soil isolates[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001 ,67(10):4863-4873.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部