期刊文献+

基于债权终止的可违约债券定价 被引量:4

The Pricing of Defaultable Bond Based on Claim Termination
原文传递
导出
摘要 已有实证结果表明流动性风险及其与违约风险的相关性是影响可违约债券收益率的重要因素,然而目前的研究还不能建立一种计算简便且同时包含流动性风险以及风险相关尤其是尾部相关性的定价模型。本文将流动性风险与违约风险都描述为债权终止事件驱动型的风险,从而可以利用与违约时间类似的出售时间来刻画流动性风险过程。基于债权终止事件的发生时间,本文拓展了简约模型以考虑流动性风险及风险相关性。与以往的研究相比,基于债权终止时间的模型具备诸多优势:模型简便适合大规模计算、允许时变流动性风险、包含尾部相关等较为丰富的风险相关性结构。数值算例表明,本文的模型能更好地刻画流动性风险溢价以及风险的尾部相关性对债券收益率曲线上下尾端的影响。 Recent empirical studies have shown that liquidity risk and its correlation with default risk are important factors to explain defaultable bond yields.However,the models incorporatoing liquidity risk for defaultable bond pricing are either too simple to deal with various risk correlation or too complex to be applied in practice.The common property of liquidity risk and default risk is that they are both claim-termination event driven risk.This faciliates the work in extending traditional default risk model for defaultable bond to incorporate liquidity risk and risk correlation.The pricing model based on claim-termination has three main advantages over traditional models: easy to implement in practice,allowing time-varying liquidity risk,and easy to deal with various correlation between liquidity risk and default risk including tail dependence.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期8-17,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重大课题(70831004z)
关键词 可违约债券定价 流动性风险 债权终止 风险相关 pricing of defaultable bond liquidity risk claim termination risk correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Merton R. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1974, 29 (2): 449-470.
  • 2Longstaff F, Schwartz E. A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1995, 50(3): 789-819.
  • 3Jarrow R, Lando D, Turnbull S. A markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10 (2): 481-523.
  • 4Madan D, Unal P, Pricing the risks of default [J]. Review of Derivative Research, 1998, 2(1): 121-160.
  • 5Lando D. On cox processes and credit risky securities [J]. Review of Derivatives Research, 1998, 2: 99-120.
  • 6Elton E, Gruber M, Agrawal D, Mann C. Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds [J], The Journal of Finance. 2001, 56(1): 247-277.
  • 7Houweling P, Mentink A, Vorst T. Comparing possible proxies of corporate bond liquidity [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2005, 29: 1331-1358.
  • 8Longstaff F, Mithal S, Neis E. Corporate yield spreads: default risk or liquidity? new evidence from the credit default swap market [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(5): 2213-2253.
  • 9Duffie D, Singleton K. Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds [J]. Review of Financial Stuldies, 1999, 12: 687-720.
  • 10Jarrow R. Default parameter estimation using market prices [J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2001, 57(5): 75-92.

二级参考文献92

  • 1杨文瀚,王燕.信用违约互换的定价模型及实证研究[J].统计与决策,2005,21(04X):37-38. 被引量:6
  • 2Moody' s' 1999, Standard & Poor' s 1999, and Brunner et al, 2000. www. moodys, com; www. Standardpoor. com.
  • 3JP Morgan. CreditMetrics Technical Document[R]. 1997.
  • 4KMV. Credit Monitor Overview[R]. San Francisco: KMV. Corporation, Mimeo, 1993.
  • 5Credit Suisse Financial Products. Credit Risk Plus[J]. Technology Document[R]. Londono New York, October 1997.
  • 6Basel Committee. the New Basle Capital Accord (CP3) 2003.4.
  • 7Merton,R. C. On the pricing of corporate debt:The risk structure of interest rates[J]. Journal of Finance,1974, 29:449--470.
  • 8Merton, R. C. On the pricing of contingent claims and the Modigliani--Miller theorem[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1977, 15(2) : 241--250.
  • 9JP Morgan. CreditMetries Technical Document. 1997.
  • 10Credit Suisse First Boston. Credit Risk +: A Credit Risk Management[R]. Technical document, Credit Suisse Financial Products, London, 1997.

共引文献75

同被引文献87

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部