期刊文献+

维和军人集训期反事实思维表现调查 被引量:1

Survey on the counterfactual thinking performace of the peacekeeping armymen at duration of mass training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨军人执行维和执行任务集结训练中反事实思维的表现,以便进行矢之有效的心理干预。方法提出2个前提反事实任务,对98名军人进行测试。结果独生子产生反事实论断最多。是否独生子间存在显著性差异,城乡间无显著差异。上行反事实、下行反事实、加法反事实及替代反事实独生子显著多于非独生子,减法反事实差异不显著。是否独生子、城乡与思维结构之间存在交互作用,在三种结构的反事实思维表现都存在显著差异。结论独生子、城镇军人产生反事实论断最多,从思维方式入手改变认知,对保障心理健康有积极意义。 Objective To investigate the counterfactual thinking performace of the peacekeeping armymen at duration of mass training, so as to take effective psychological intrevention. Methods The two antecedent counterfactual tasks was taken for testing 98 armymen. Results Only child had most counterfactual reasoning. There was significant difference between only child and non-only child, but no significant differences between armymen from town and from country. In upward, downward, additive and substitutional performaces only child armymen were more than non only child armymen, but in subtractive one no differences. Only child or non-only child armymen, armymen from town or from country, all had :interaction with thinking structure, among which there was significant difference in counterfactual thinking performace. Conclusion In armymen only child and from town counterfactual thinning is the most, thus starting with the mode of thinking to change their cognition has active significance to protect psychologic health.
机构地区 [ [
出处 《实用医药杂志》 2012年第8期735-737,共3页 Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B04) 济南军区军事训练相关课题
关键词 军人 维和集结训练 反事实思维 Soldier Mass training for peacekeeping of United Nations Counterfactual thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Byme R,McEleney A. Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act[J]. J Exp Psycho Learn Mem Cogn,2000,26 (12) : 1318-1331.
  • 2Harris P, German T, Mills P. Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning[J]. Cognition, 1996,61 (3) : 233-259.
  • 3周国梅,荆其诚.心理学家Daniel Kahneman获2002年诺贝尔经济学奖[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(1):1-5. 被引量:44
  • 4Guajardo N,Turley A. Preschoolers' generation of different types of counterfactual statements and theory of mind understanding[J]. Cognitive Development, 2004,19 ( 1 ) : 53-80.
  • 5Roese N,Olson J. The structure of counterfactual thought[J]. Pers Soc Psychol B, 1993,19(3) :312-319.
  • 6Markman K,Gavanski I,Sherman S,et al. The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol, 1993,29( 1 ) :87-109.
  • 7Markman K,Gavanski I,Sherman S,et al. The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds[J]. Pers Soc Psychol B,1995,21(6):588-595.
  • 8Riggs K,Peterson D,Robinson E,et al. Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality?[J] Cognitive Development, 1998,13( 1 ) :73-90.
  • 9Roese N, Olson J. Counterfactual thinking:A critical overview[M]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc. Mahwah, New Jersey,1995.1- 55.
  • 10Morris M, Moore P. The lessons we (don't) team: Counter-factual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000,45(12):737-780.

二级参考文献13

  • 1王甦.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.281-282.
  • 2Simon H A. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1947
  • 3Simon H A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955. 99~118
  • 4Kahneman D, Tversky A. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3: 430~454
  • 5Kahneman D, Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 1973, 80: 237~251
  • 6Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1944
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47: 313~327
  • 8Kahneman D, Knetsch J, and Thaler R. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the cost theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 1325~1348
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185: 1124~1131
  • 10Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982

共引文献43

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部