期刊文献+

外周血趋化因子水平对新型甲流H1N1患者临床转归的预测价值

Prognostic values of chemokines in different clinical outcomes of influenza A (H1N1)-infected patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新型甲流H1N1患者外周血趋化因子水平对临床预后转归的预测价值。方法以2009年4月至2010年1月间经北京佑安医院收治的新型甲流H1N1患者60例为研究对象,分为轻症组(32例)、重症痊愈组(16例)、死亡组(12例)。Luminex技术检测外周血清中趋化因子CXCL8、CCL10、CCL2、CCL3、CCIA、CCL5及CCL11水平。结果新型甲流H1N1死亡组外周血CXCL8、CCL2及CCL10水平明显高于重症组及轻症组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义,P值分别为0.001、〈0.0001及0.027。CCL2、CXCL8水平预测新型甲流H1N1感染死亡的阈值分别为45.99ng/L(灵敏性为100%,特异性为89.58%)、59.75ng/L(灵敏性为75%,特异性为95.83%)。结论新型甲流H1N1重症感染者外周血中趋化因子水平明显增加,CXCL8、CCL2在死亡组增加尤为明显,可作为新型甲流H1N1感染不良预后预测指标。 Objective To analyze the prognostic values of chemokines in different clinical outcomes of influenza A (H1N1)-infected patients. Methods A total of 60 cases with influenza A (H1N1) virus were enrolled. There were 32 mild cases, 16 healing cases from severe stage and 12 mortality cases resulting from severe stage. The serum levels of chemokines including CXCLS, CCL10, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5 and CCL11 were detected by the Luminex technique. Results The levels of CXCL8, CCL2 and CCL10 in the mortality group were higher than those of the healing serve and mild cases. And the differences were significant. P value was 0. 001, 〈 0. 0001 and 0. 027 respectively. The thresholds of CCL2 and CXCL8 for predicting clinical mortality were 45.99 ng/L ( sensitivity 100%, specificity 89.58% ) and 59.75 ng/L (sensitivity 75%, specificity 95.83% ). Conclusion The serum levels of chemokines are elevated in severe cases of influenza A (H1N1). And the rises of CXCL8 and CCL2 are more obvious in the mortality cases. Thus CXCL8 and CCL2 may serve as two prognostic indices for the clinical fatal outcomes.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第29期2020-2022,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 基金项目:中国初级保健基金(BJYAH-2009-014) 北京市科委北京重大疾病临床数据和样本资源库建设(1909050703560903)
关键词 流感病毒A型 H1N1亚型 趋化因子类 预后 Influenza A virus, H1N1 subtype Chemotactic factors Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1ANZIC Influenza Investigators, Webb SA, Pettila V, et al. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med,2009,361:1925-1934.
  • 2Lee N, Wong CK, Chan PK, et al. Cytokine response patterns in severe pandemic 2009 HIN1 and seasonal influenza among hospitalized adults. PLoS One, 2011, 6 : e26050.
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.甲型H1Nl流感诊疗方案(2009年第3版).中华临床感染病杂志,2009,:1-1.
  • 4Laguna-Torres VA, Benavides JG. Infection and death from influenza A H1N1 virus in Mexico. Lancet, 2009, 374: 2032- 2033.
  • 5Castor MG, Pinho V, Teixeira MM. The role of chemokines in mediating graft versus host disease: opportunities for novel therapeutics. Front Pharmacol, 2012, 3:23.
  • 6Kawada J, Kimura H, ho Y, et al. Systemic cytokine responses in patients with influenza-associated encephalopathy. J Infect Dis, 2003, 188 : 690-698.
  • 7Hosoya M, Nunoi H, Aoyama M, et al. Cytochrome c and tumor necrosis factor-alpha values in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with influenza-associated encephalopathy. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2005, 24:467-470.
  • 8Wu W, Booth JL, Duggan ES, et al. Innate immune response to H3N2 and H1N1 influenza virus infeetion in a human lung organ culture model. Virology, 2010, 396 : 178-188.
  • 9Takano T, Tajiri H, Kashiwagi Y, et al. Cytokine and chemokine response in children with the 2009 pandemic influenza A ( H1N1 ) virus infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2011, 30: 117- 120.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部