软通道和硬通道微创介入治疗高血压脑出血临床对照分析

Soft Channel and Hardware Channels Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Control

目的对硬通道和软通道治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果及其优劣进行分析探讨。方法分别采用硬通道微创介入法与软通道微创介入法治疗高血压脑出血,比较两种结果。结果 155例患者治愈好转,占89.1%;转手术治疗19例,包括穿刺引流效果不满意转手术治疗8例和再出血保守治疗无效而转手术治疗11例。结论软通道引流手术操作对颅内血管二次损伤较小,硬通道碎吸针则对脑血管损伤较大。

Objective To hard channel and the clinical effect of the pros and cons of the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the soft channel to explore the gap. Methods Using the hard channel minimally inva- sive method with the soft channel minimally invasive treatment of cerebral hemorrhage, and compared the two re- sults. Results 155 cases were cured and, accounting for 89.1% ; turn the surgical treatment of 19 cases, inclu- ding puncture and drainage effects were not satisfied with transfer surgery 8 cases and rebleeding failed conservative treatment and switch to the surgical treatment of 11 cases of soft - channel drainage was the effect of has obvious advantages. Conclusion The soft cited during surgical procedures could be with less damage to the intracranial blood vessels secondary hard channel needle aspiration of cerebral vascular damage.