期刊文献+

试论美国内战后国会重建失败的必然性 被引量:2

On inevitable failure of American congressional radical reconstruction after the Civil War
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国内战后国会重建的失败有其必然性:以种族平等为特色的重建方案超越了当时白人所能接受和认可的范围,也与当时全球范围内的种族主义和殖民主义浪潮格格不入;由于南方白人强烈的种族主义意识,以及在人数、经济和武力上的巨大优势,重建政府在其进攻下根本无力自保;因军事力量的使用受到诸多掣肘,再加上联邦主义的束缚,对于南方各州重建政权的垮台,联邦政府鞭长莫及。 The failure of American congressional radical reconstruction after the Civil War was inevitable.The congressional reconstruction featuring racial equality was beyond the scope that the white could accept and was contrary to worldwide wave of racism and colonialism at that time.Due to racism and the great advantages at numbers,economy and arms of the southern whites,the radical state governments couldn’t last on their own resources.However,the federal government couldn’t offer enough protection owing to federalism and the constraints of using forces.
作者 杨馗
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第4期138-143,共6页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 美国内战 总统重建 国会重建 种族主义 Civil War Presidential reconstruction congressional reconstruction racism
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1詹姆斯·麦克弗森.火的考验:美国南北战争及重建南部(下册)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994.
  • 2Marion M. M. Great debates in American history (Vol. 7) [C]. Metuchen: Mini- Print Corporation, 1970.
  • 3U. S. Congress. An act to provide for the more efficient Government of Rebel States [EB/OL]. http://memory.loc.gov/ cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=014/lls1014.db&recNum= 460. 2010-10-08.
  • 4U. S. Congress. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 [EB/OL]. http:// ehnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/recon/civilrightsact.html. 2010-10- 08.
  • 5Robert M. G. Reconstruction and Black Suffrage: Losing the vote in Reese and Guikshank [M]. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2001.
  • 6Leon L. North of Slavery: The Negro in the Free States, 1790- 1860 [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1961.
  • 7C. Vann Woodward. Seeds of failure in Radical Race Policy [J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1966, 110(1): 1-9.
  • 8Page S. Trial by Fire: A people's History of the Civil War and Reconstruction, volume five [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982.
  • 9威廉·科尔曼著 严晴燕译.19世纪的生物学和人学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.100-111.
  • 10斯塔夫里阿诺斯.全球通史(下册)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.

共引文献5

同被引文献28

  • 1任东来,陈伟,白雪峰.《美国宪政历程:影响美国的25个司法大案》,北京,中国法制出版社,2005年版,第191页.
  • 2Brown v.Board of Education of Topeka,347U.S.483(1954).
  • 3Richard Kluger.Simple justice:the history of Brown v.Board of Education and black America's struggle for equality.London:Andre Deutsch,1975.
  • 4Gerald N.Rosenberg.The Hollow Hope:Can Courts Bring about Social Change?.Chicago:University of Chicago,1991.
  • 5Susan Rosenfeld.Encyclopedia of American Historical Documents.New York:Facts On File,Inc.,2004.
  • 6[美]埃里克·方纳.给我自由!一部美国的历史(下册)[M].王希,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
  • 7United Nations.Charter of the United Nations.http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml,2012-06-06.
  • 8Charles H.Martin.Internationalizing'The American Dilemma':The Civil Rights Congress and the1951Genocide Petition to the United Nations.Journal of American Ethnic History,1997,(4).
  • 9Michal R.Belknap.Civil Rights,The White Houseand the Justice Department:1945-1968.New York:Garland Publishing,Inc.,1991.
  • 10Waldo E.Martin.Brown v.Board of Education:a brief History with Documents.Boston:Bedford/St.Martin's,1998.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部