期刊文献+

中国学习者英语学术词块的使用及发展特征研究 被引量:56

The Use and Developmental Features of Lexical Bundles in Chinese Learners' English Academic Writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 本次研究探讨中国学习者在英语论文写作中如何使用学术词块及发展特征。研究首先确定了语言学国际期刊所使用的高频学术词块在总量、结构和功能上的特点。然后通过语料对比发现,我国学习者使用大量高频词块,但同时得到国际学者高频使用的词块量较少。这些与学者共同使用的词块中,总体上,过多使用和使用不足的倾向并存;不过学习者在本、硕、博阶段不断发展,以博士与学者共同使用的词块在总量、结构和功能分布上最多。此外研究发现,那些专家低频或不使用的学习者词块中,有一部分带有母语思维特征、被动句式、口语体和不地道的用法。这些研究结果对理解二语写作中文字能力的发展以及改进学术写作教学有一定的启示。 This study investigates Chinese learners' use and developmental features of lexical bundles in their thesis writing. The study first identifies lexical bundles in research articles published in world applied linguistics journals in terms of their proportional, structural and functional patterns. Through the corpus-based comparison, the study finds that learners use a great amount of bundles but scholars only use a small fraction of them. Overall, learners either overuse or underuse these same bundles; however, they keep progressing and PhD students use the highest proportion of bundles with a more variety of structures and functions. Besides, those bundles infrequently or never used by scholars show either learners' mother tongue influence, passive structures, colloquial or non-idiomatic use. The results have some implications for understanding literacy development in L2 academic writing as well as improving academic writing pedagogy.
作者 徐昉
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期51-56,共6页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"二语学术写作中的评价系统研究"(12BYY052) 江苏省社会科学基金项目"学生英语学术论文写作能力研究"(09YYB001)的资助
关键词 词块 英语写作 学术写作 语料库 lexical bundles English writing academic writing corpus
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Biber, D. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.
  • 2Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2004(25): 371-405.
  • 3Biber, D. et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. London: Pearson Education Limited, 1999.
  • 4Cortes, V. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2004 (23): 397-423.
  • 5Charles, M. Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2007 (26): 203-218.
  • 6Hood, S. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing [M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • 7Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (eds). Evaluation in Text." Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 8Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [J]. Discouse Studies, 2005(7): 173-192.
  • 9Hyland, K. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2008 (27): 4-21.
  • 10Li, J., & Schmitt, N. The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2009 (18): 85-102.

二级参考文献189

共引文献1008

同被引文献588

引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部