母语概念迁移能力、隐喻能力与语言水平的发展关系研究被引量：34

Developmental connections among L1 conceptual transfer competence, metaphoric competence and English proficiency

导出

摘要本研究通过考察高、低两水平组英语学习者的隐喻能力,探究了母语概念迁移能力、隐喻能力和英语水平三者之间的发展关系。结果显示,两组受试者的隐喻能力都比较低,但高水平组显著高于低水平组;高水平阶段,母语概念迁移能力对外语隐喻能力的促进作用减弱,同时隐喻能力对语言水平的影响力下降。外语环境下教、学、考三方对语言形式和技能的关注远远高于对语言概念体系的关注,这是学习者隐喻能力发展滞后于语言水平发展的重要原因。 By examining the metaphoric competence of English learners at low and high levels, this paper explores the developmental connections among L1 conceptual transfer competence, metaphoric competence and English proficiency. The findings are ： metaphoric competence strengthens with the increase of English level significantly even though both groups＇ metaphoric competence develops slowly; in the high-level group, the influence of learners＇ L1 conceptual transfer on English metaphoric competence weakens and the influence of their metaphoric competence on English proficiency changes in the same way. These results show that in FL learning environment, the three sections, namely teaching, learning and evaluation, all pay much more attention to language＇ s forms and skills than to its conceptual system, which leads to the result that the advancement of learners＇ meta- phorical competence lags behind the development of their English proficiency.

作者石进芳

机构地区华东交通大学

出处《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期57-63,共7页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice

基金江西省高校人文社科基金项目(YY1115)的阶段性成果

关键词母语概念迁移能力隐喻能力英语水平 L1 conceptual transfer competence metaphoric competence English proficiency

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1Cook, V. , B. Bassetti, C. Kasai et al. 2006. "Do bilin- guals have different concepts? The case of shape and mate- rial in Japanese 1.2 users of English". International Jour- nal of Bilingualism 10. pp. 137-152.
2Danesi, M. 1992. "Metaphorical competence in second lan- guage acquisition and second language teaching: the Neg- lected Dimension". In I. E Alatis ( ed. ). Georgetown U- niversity Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1992: Language, communication and social meaning. Washing- ton, D. C. : Georgetown University Press.
3Danesi, M. 1986. "The role of metaphor in second language pedagogy". Rassegna Italina di Linguistica Applicata 18. pp. 1-10.
4Gagne, C. 2002. "Metaphoric interpretations of comparison- based eombinations". Metaphor and Symbol 17. pp. 161- 178.
5Gardner H. & E. Winner. 1979. "The development of meta- phoric competence: implications for humanistic disci- plines". In S. Sacks (ed.). On Metaphor. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
6Hudson, W. 1989. "Semantic theory and L2 lexical develop- ment". In S. Gass & J. Schachter (eds.). Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
7Irujo, S. 1986. "Don' t put your leg in your month: transfer in the acquisition of idioms in a second language". TESOL Quarterly 20. pp. 287-304.
8Jarvis, S. & A. Pavlenko. 2008. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York and London: Rout- ledge.
9Johnson, J. & T. Rosano. 1993. "Relation of cognitive style to metaphor interpretation and second language proficien- cy". Applied Linguistics 14. pp. 159-175.
10Litflemore, J. 2001. "Metaphoric competence: a language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style" ? TESOL Quarterly 35. pp. 459-491.