期刊文献+

历史制度主义视域下戊戌变法失败的反思

Reflections on the Failure of the Reform Movement of 1898:From the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在历史制度主义研究视野中,制度替换往往发生于旧制度危机日益严重并将发生崩溃的"临界点"时期,决定政治走向的行动集团如果把握了行动的主导权就可能在制度变迁中成功实现制度创新。1898年的戊戌变法试图通过自上而下的渐进式改革来突破中国封建王朝路径依赖的惰性,把中国带入民主宪政的轨道之内。从新制度主义视角分析,以康有为为首的维新集团是晚清政治舞台上势力很弱的政治集团,其先天不足的因素包括组织涣散、意识形态凝聚力与整合力不足、改革所需的资源匮乏以及臣民文化对变法的阻抗等,都决定了戊戌变法不可能完成近代中国制度创新这一伟大历史使命。 From the perspective of historical institutionalism,system replacement often occurs at a 'critical point' when the old system crisis is increasingly serious and a crash will occur.The action group which determines the political trend may successfully bring about the institutional innovation if it grasps the initiative of the action.The Reform Movement of 1898 attempted a top-down gradual reform to break the laziness of Chinese feudal dynasty and put China on the track of democratic constitutionalism.From the viewpoint of historical institutionalism,the Restoration Group led by Kang You-wei was a weak political group of the late Qing government.It had many inherent deficiencies including slack organization,inadequate ideological cohesion and integration,desperate shortage of the reform resources,and the feudal culture's resistance to political reform.Hence the impossibility of the Reform Movement of 1898 to complete the great historic mission of the institutional innovation of modern China.
出处 《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2012年第4期21-28,94,共8页 Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 戊戌变法 历史制度主义 制度变迁 制度创新 the Reform Movement of 1898 historical institutionalism system change system innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1吴敬链.路径依赖与中国改革--对诺斯教授演讲的评论[J].改革,1995(3):57-59.
  • 2道格拉斯·C·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行译.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,2008.24.
  • 3Ruth Berins Collier,David Collier.Shaping the Political Arena, Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America [M].Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991:29.
  • 4谭嗣同.仁学--谭嗣同集[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1994.
  • 5西达.斯考切波.国家与社会革命[M].何俊志,王学东,译.上海:上海人民出版社.2007:18.
  • 6汤志钧.成戌变法史[M]上海:上海科学出版社,2003.
  • 7梁启超.戊戌政变记:卷1[M].饮冰室合集:专集之一.北京:中华书局.1989.
  • 8杨瑞龙.论我国制度变迁方式与制度选择目标的冲突及其协调[J].经济研究,1994,29(5):40-49. 被引量:139
  • 9马基雅维利.君主论[M].张志伟等译.西安:陕西人民出版社,2001,35.
  • 10曼瑟尔.奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995.31-42.

二级参考文献25

  • 1罗能生.非正式制度安排与中国的经济改革[J].学习与探索,1998(1):35-40. 被引量:15
  • 2杨瑞龙.论制度供给[J].经济研究,1993,28(8):45-52. 被引量:230
  • 3林毅夫,蔡昉,李周.论中国经济改革的渐进式道路[J].经济研究,1993,28(9):3-11. 被引量:191
  • 4Ansell,Christopher,2006,Network Institutionalism,in Rhodes,R.A.W.;Binder,Sarah A.& Rockman,Bert A.(eds.),The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions,Oxford University Press.
  • 5Hay,Colin,2002,Political Analysis:A Critical Introduction,Palgrave MacMillan.
  • 6Schmidt,Vivien A.,2006,Give Peace A Chance:Reconciling Four (Not Three) "New Institutionalism",The Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association (Philadelphia,PA,Aug.31-Sept.3,2006).
  • 7Lieberman,Robert C.,2002,Ideas,Institutions,and Political Order:Explaining Political Change,in American Political Science Review,Vol.96,No.4.
  • 8Pierson,Paul,2004,Politics in Time:History,Institutions,and Social Analysis,Princeton University Press.
  • 9Barzelay,Michael & Gallego,Raquel,2006,From "New institutionalism" to "Institutional Processualism":Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change,in Governance:An International Journal of Policy,Administration and Institutions,Vol.19,No.4,October.
  • 10Berman,Sheri,2001,Ideas,Norms,and Culture in Political Analysis,in Comparative Polictics,January.

共引文献303

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部