期刊文献+

管制俘获成因的定性比较分析 被引量:11

Research on the causes of regulatory capture:a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有管制理论始终未能对管制俘获成因给出有说服力的解释这一缺陷,采用模糊定性比较分析方法作为改进策略.通过对国内部分企业高管进行深度访谈,发现管制俘获现象背后隐藏着不同的交易模式,国有企业常通过自身影响力来影响政府出台对其有利的管制政策,而民营企业或初创企业则更多通过行政贿赂的方式俘获政府官员以换取政策的变通执行,与此同时,这种交易模式的差异性又与行业集中度及政府干预程度密切相关. Since the existing regulation theory cannot give a persuasive explanation for regulatory capture causes, the root of capture and the hidden trade patterns in China were studied based on fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Examining in-depth interviews of executives of several enterprises, it was found that there were several trading models hidden in regulatory capture. The state-owned enterprises had an impact on the formation of the basic rules of the game without necessarily involving private payments to public officials ; firms still wielded power over the politician. However, the methods by which private firms shaped the basic rules of the game were illicit and the private payments to public officials were not transparent. At the same time, the differences of such transactions were closely related to industry concentration and the degree of government intervention.
作者 李健 西宝
出处 《哈尔滨工程大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期923-928,共6页 Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61074133)
关键词 管制俘获 定性比较分析 直接收买 游说 regulatory capture qualitative comparative analysis bribe lobbying
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1WOOD B D, WATERMAN R W. The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy [ J ]. The American Political Sci- ence Review,1991,35(3) : 801-828.
  • 2AUSTEN-SMITH D. Sophisticated sincerity : voting over en- dogenous agendas [ J ]. The American Political Science Re-view, 1978, 81(4) : 1323-1330.
  • 3MCCORMICK R E, TOLLISON R D. Legislatures as unions [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1978, 86( 1 ) : 63- 78.
  • 4石淑华.政府俘获理论的比较分析——芝加哥学派与弗吉尼亚学派[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2006(12):8-11. 被引量:5
  • 5BARON D P, MYERSON R B. Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs [ J ]. Econometrica, 1982, 50 ( 4 ) : 911-930.
  • 6HELLMAN J S, JONES G, KAUFMANN D. Measuring gov- ernance, corruption, and state capture how firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition e- conomic [ R ]. Washington DC : World Bank, 2000 : 1-51.
  • 7DAL BO P, DI T R. "Plata o Plomo?" : bribe and punish- ment in a theory of political influence [ J ]. American Politi- cal Science Review, 2006,100( 1 ) :41-53.
  • 8NAURO F, GIOVANNONI F. Lobbying, corruption and po- litical influence [ J ]. Public Choice, 2007, 131 ( 1/2 ) : 1- 21.
  • 9FACCIO M, MASULIS R, JOHN J. Political connections and corporate bailouts [ J ]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (6) :2597-2635.
  • 10BERTRAND M, KRAMARAZ F, SCHOAR A, et al. Pol- iticians, firms and the political business cycle: evidence from France[ R]. Chicago : University of Chicago, 2007.

共引文献154

同被引文献216

引证文献11

二级引证文献277

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部