期刊文献+

股权激励实施中股东、经理与审计师三方博弈分析 被引量:3

Analysis of Three Party Game among Shareholder,Manager and Auditor under Stock-based Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股权激励是一把"双刃剑":一方面能起到降低代理成本的长期激励作用,另一方面也能诱发经理进行信息操纵。文章建立了一个股权激励实施中股东、经理与审计师之间的三方博弈模型来分析如何规避股权激励引致的经理信息操纵行为。通过对均衡解的分析得出以下结论:股东不断提高监控的技能及手段,加大对经理与审计师合谋操纵会计信息的惩罚力度,加强资本市场监管、提高资本市场的有效性能规避经理与审计师合谋操纵会计信息的行为。 Stock-based compensation is a "two-edged sword": on the one hand, it can decrease agent cost andplay a long-term Incentive role; on the other hand, it can induce managers to manipulate information. In this paper, the authors construct a three party game model among shareholders, manager and auditor to study how to prevent the manager manipulating information. The results show that shareholders improve the technical ability and measures to punish the manager and auditor heavily when they collude to manipulate financial information, to monitor stock market more frequently and improve the efficiency of capital market, which can avoid financial information manipulation.
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期38-41,共4页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 重庆市教委资助项目(KJ100609) 重庆市科委资助项目(CSTC 2010BB9327)
关键词 股权激励 会计信息操纵 三方博弈 stock-based compensation financial information manipulation three party game
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1顾斌,周立烨.我国上市公司股权激励实施效果的研究[J].会计研究,2007(2):79-84. 被引量:352
  • 2刘玉勋.经理人股票期权交易的性质及会计确认和计量研究[J].企业经济,2011,30(11):56-60. 被引量:3
  • 3GOLDMAN E, SLEZAK S L. An equilibrium model of incentive contracts in the presence of information manipulation [ J ]. Journal of Financial and Economics, 2006, 80 : 603 - 626.
  • 4ELITZUR R R, YAARI V. Executive incentive compensation and earning manipulation in a multi-period settingJ ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1995, 26 : 201- 219.
  • 5GUTTMAN I, KADAN O. Adding the noise: a theory of compensation-driven earnings management [ R ]. Working paper, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2003.
  • 6BAR-GILL O, BEBCHUK L. Misreporting corporate performance[R]. Working paper, Harvard Law School, 2003.
  • 7SINGH R. Incentive Compensation and the Quality of Disclosure [ R ]. Working paper, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, 2003.
  • 8ANDERGASSEN R. Product market competition, incentives and fraudulent behavior[ J]. Economics Letters, 2010,107 : 201 - 204.
  • 9IBRAHIM S, LLOYD C. The association between non-financial performance measures in executive compensation contracts and earnings management[J] J. Account. Public Policy, 2011:30 256 -274.
  • 10DENIS D J, HANOUNA P, SARIN A. Is there a dark side to incentive compensation? [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006, 12:467 - 488.

二级参考文献63

共引文献408

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部