摘要
在充分释读考察敦煌写本影印卷和排比归纳敦煌文献用例的基础上,结合汉语俗字研究的新成果,从汉语史的角度出发,指出敦煌文献中并不存在量词"笙"。"笙"是"茎"的俗讹字,敦煌写本卷二者字形相似,二者只是字用关系。
After full annotation and interpretation of the Tunhuang(敦煌) photographic docu- ment and sorting out the example sentences herein, this paper, from the angle of the history of the Chinese language and with the help of the most current achievements in Chinese demotic writing, holds that the measure word "sheng(笙) " does not exist in Tunhuang document. "sheng" is very sim- / ilar to "jing (茎) "from their demotic writing glyphs in Tunhuang writing volume.
出处
《语言科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期436-440,共5页
Linguistic Sciences
基金
国家社科基金重大招标项目(10&ZD117)
江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CX09B_080R)资助
关键词
敦煌文献
量词
笙
茎
Tunhuang document Measure word sheng jing