期刊文献+

40例硬膜外分娩镇痛对新生儿的影响 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用硬膜外分娩镇痛对新生儿的影响。方法将2010年6~12月天津医科大学总医院及武警医学院附属医院产科住院待阴道分娩的初产妇80例,计算机编号后随机分为观察组及对照组,各40例,观察组孕妇确定其临产后,施行硬膜外分娩镇痛;对照组不施行硬膜外分娩镇痛,两组均严密观察产程进展并给予常规相应的处理。结果两组孕妇年龄、孕周、身高、头盆评分、体质量指数、潜伏期疼痛等级、血压、心率及胎心率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组活跃晚期宫缩疼痛程度、血压、心率及剖宫产率明显低于对照组(P<0.05),器械助产概率及新生儿窒息的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论硬膜外分娩镇痛可有效减轻产痛,对新生儿无不良影响。
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第25期2650-2652,共3页 Chongqing medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Conell Price J, Evans J B, Hong D, et al. The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the pro- gress of labor in the assessment of pain [J]. Anesth Analg,2008,106 (5):1509-1515.
  • 2Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update[J]. An- esthesiology, 2005,103 (3) ,645-653.
  • 3Abrao KC,Francisco RP,Miyadahira S,et al. Elevation of uterine basal tone and fetal heart rate abnormalities after labor analgesia: a randomized conerolled trial[J ]. Obstet Gynecol,2009,113(1) :41-47.
  • 4曲元.妇产科麻醉分册[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:129.
  • 5任利容,王泽华.罗比卡因和布比卡因用于自控硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果对比研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(3):175-177. 被引量:8
  • 6Skupski DW, Abramovitz S, Samuels J, et al. Adverse effects of combined spinal-epidural versus traditional epidural an- algesia during labor[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2009,106 (3) :242-245.
  • 7王安,党金良.硬膜外分娩镇痛60例临床观察[J].山东医药,2001,41(12):67-67. 被引量:3
  • 8Sia AT,Lim Y,Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infu sion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007,104 (3) : 673-678.
  • 9岳红丽,韩如泉,李彦平,李树人.罗哌卡因-芬太尼用于硬膜外和腰-硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛效果及安全性[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(8):657-660. 被引量:57
  • 10刘楠,闻良珍.分娩期镇痛方法的选择及应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(5):272-274. 被引量:83

二级参考文献24

  • 1易三平,喻宏,孟庆新,姚尚龙.罗比卡因硬膜外阻滞行剖宫产时胎儿脐静脉血及产妇静脉血血药浓度的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(11):771-772. 被引量:5
  • 2Hess PE,Pratt SD,Soni AK,et al.An association between severe labour pain and cesarean delivery.Anesth Analg,2000,90:881-886.
  • 3Knudsen K.Central nervous and Cardiovascular effects during iv infusion of ropovacaine,bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers.Br J Anaesth,1997,78:507-514.
  • 4Capogna G,Celleno D,Fusco P,et al.Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour.Br J Anaesth,1999,82: 371-373.
  • 5Cederholm I.Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.Drug Saf 1997,16(6): 391-402.
  • 6Campbell DC,Zwack RM,Crone LA,et al.Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: bipivacaine versus ropivacaine.Anesth Analy.2000,90 ⑹:1384-1389.
  • 7Thorp JA,Hu DH,Albin RM,et al.The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labour: a randomised controlled prospective trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol ,1993,169: 851-858.
  • 8Loughnan BA,Carli F,Romney M,et al.Randomised controlled comparison of epidural versus pethidine for analgesia in labour.Br J Anaesth,2000,84: 715-719.
  • 9Olofsson C,Ekblom A,Ekman-Oreberg G,et al.Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine -adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil- a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1998,4
  • 10Gaiser RR,Venkateswaren P,Cheek TG,et al.Comparison of 0.25%ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural anagesia for labor and vaginal delivery.J Clin Anesth,1997,9(7):564-568.

共引文献159

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部