摘要
在兴奋剂案件中,对是否应该准许运动员提出的请求实验室提供包括标准操作程序资料、一般质量管理资料等文件的证据调查申请有很大的争论。证据调查需要有可证实性,否则会拖延裁判,也会给当事人造成很大的负担,但在像兴奋剂纠纷一样的现代型纠纷中,过度强调证据调查的可证实性会产生新的不公平,需要通过设置有限的证据开示制度,同时辅以适当的控制措施以平衡双方当事人的利益。
There have been disputes over whether in the doping cases athletes involved should be allowed to have access to evidence regarding standard lab operating procedures and general quality management material or not. Evi- dence investigation should be verifiable or the arbitration will be delayed or harm can be done to the concerned par- ty. However, excessive emphasis on evidence investigation leads to new unfairness. Therefore, limited discovery with appropriate controls to balance the profit of all the parties should be encouraged.
出处
《武汉体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第7期36-42,共7页
Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(11CFX076)
湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2011B239)
关键词
兴奋剂纠纷
证据调查
可证实性
体育仲裁
doping case
evidence investigation
verifiability
sports arbitration