期刊文献+

罗氏Modular E170与Cobas e601电化学发光免疫分析系统检测血清甲胎蛋白的比对分析 被引量:4

Comparative analysis on the results of serum α-fetoprotein with Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system Modular E170 and Cobas e601
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨同一临床实验室内罗氏Modular E170与Cobas e601两台电化学发光仪检测结果的可比性,确保两套分析系统检测血清甲胎蛋白结果的准确性和一致性。方法根据美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南文件EP9-A2文件要求,以罗氏Modular E170电化学发光免疫分析仪为对比仪器,罗氏Cobas e601电化学发光免疫分析仪为实验仪器,采用用患者血清样本检测甲胎蛋白(AFP)含量,通过实验数据的比对分析,对两套分析系统之间的预期偏倚进行评估。结果在AFP测定的线性范围内,两系统相关性好,在AFP医学决定水平处的预期偏倚均可接受。结论两套系统检测AFP结果具有较好的一致性。临床实验室内同一检测项目同时在两套或两套以上系统检测时应进行比对和偏倚评估,确保检测结果具有可比性。 Objective To investigate the comparability of the results of serum AFP detected by Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system Modular E170 and Cobas e601 ,and to insure the accuracy and the concord ance of detecting the serum AFP in two systems. Methods The value of AFP of patient's serum detected by Cobas e601( experimental method )was compared with Roche E170 (control method ) according to the document of the CLSI EP9-A2. The comparability and bias of the two systems were evaluated. Results The relativity of the two systems in the AFP detecting linearity range was good,and the bias of the AFP concentration on the medicine decide level (MDL) was acceptable. Conclusion Two systems have good concordance in detecting the serum AFP. It is neces sary to analyze comparison and bias of the results by two or more than two systems in clinical laboratory,which can insure the comparability.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2012年第16期1974-1976,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 电化学发光仪 方法比对 甲胎蛋白 electrochemiluminescence comparative method α-fetoprotein
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

共引文献37

同被引文献22

  • 1魏吴 丛玉隆.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2004.72-75.
  • 2The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.EP9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation using patientsamples[S]. Wanye ; PA, NCCLS* 2002.
  • 3魏昊,丛玉隆.医学实验室质量管理与认可指南[Ml北京:中国计量出版社,2004 : 72-93.
  • 4Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Method comparison and bias estimation using patio samples[S]. Approved Guide line. CLSI,EP9-A. 2005.
  • 5The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. EP9- A2Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. Wanye : PA, NCCLS,2002.
  • 6Halman M. Appl. Environ. Microbiolog, 1977,34:437.
  • 7Yang H J, Gu Y, Chen C, et al. Diagnostic value of pro-gastrin- releasing Peptide for small cell hung cancer: ameta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med,2011,49 (6) : 1039-1046.
  • 8林向阳,王忠永,周武,陶志华,陈晓东,杨建荣,温秀姝,袁谦,张文辉.不同检测系统甲胎蛋白测定结果的可比性及偏倚评估研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2008,31(8):908-909. 被引量:13
  • 9常彬霞,辛绍杰.甲胎蛋白及其临床应用研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2010,18(6):576-580. 被引量:50
  • 10谢正海,黄凤英,谢圣高,梁冯,张新伟.干化学分析仪与全自动生化分析仪葡萄糖氧化酶法测定血糖的比对分析[J].湖北中医学院学报,2010,12(2):20-22. 被引量:4

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部