摘要
以反思平衡视角审视维特根斯坦的《哲学研究》对"遵守规则悖论"的处理、对概念精确性与模糊性的考察,以及《论确实性》关于信念确实性的"哥白尼式革命"、对独断论和怀疑论的批判,可以发现:语言游戏规则或行为规则与特殊的语言游戏之间构成一种狭义的反思平衡关系,系列相互竞争的一般原则与特殊的生活实践之间构成一种广义的反思平衡关系。这些反思平衡基本符合源于罗尔斯的三个要求以及弗洛斯达尔提出的五大特征,此外还具有某种奇特性。
When we explore how Wittgenstein deals with the 'rule-following paradox' and analysis accuracy and ambiguity of concepts in Philosophical Investigations,and his 'Copernican revolution' about the certainty of belief,and criticism of dogmatism and skepticism from the perspective of reflective equilibrium in On Certainty,it can be seen that there is a narrow reflective equilibrium between the rules of language-game(or behaviour) and specific language-games,and a broad reflective equilibrium between series of competing general principles and specific normal practice.These two kinds of reflective equilibrium are in accordance with John Rawls' three basic requirements and the five characteristics proposed by Follesdal.Besides,they also have some peculiar properties.
出处
《哲学分析》
2012年第4期115-125,199,共11页
Philosophical Analysis
基金
教育部青年基金项目:"戴维森哲学的整体性研究"(项目批准号:11YJC720004)
关键词
确实性
语言游戏
遵守规则
反思平衡
哥白尼式革命
certainty
language
language-game
rule
rule-following
reflective equilibrium
Copernican revolution.