摘要
本文以益冈(1995)中提到的"对比·逆接型定语从句"为研究对象,根据南(1993)中「文の構造」的分类指出:"对比"和"逆接"在考察定语从句与主句之间的语义关系时是两个不同的概念。"对比"是"并列"、"选择"的上位概念,"逆接"表示前后发生的两项事件之间在逻辑上的矛盾关系。日语定语从句与主句的逆接语义关系与前田(2009)提出的「逆原因文」的逻辑语义相似,均表示与预期可能发生的某种因果关系相反的逻辑关系。
Based on Minami (1993), this paper explores the Japanese nonrestrictive clause of "taihi- gyakusetsu", which was mentioned by Masuoka (1995). As a result, this paper proposes that "taihi" and "gyakusetsu" are different concepts when we observe the semantic relation between the Japanese nonrestrictive clause and its main clause. "Taihi" is a higher level concept than either "parallel" or "selection". "Gyakusetsu" expresses a paradoxical logical relationship between two affairs which occurred subsequently. The logical semantic meaning of the Japanese nonrestrictive clause of "gyakusetsu" is similar to "gyakusetsu geninbun" which was identified by Maeda (2009). Both terms are used to express a relationship which is opposite to some expected causal relation.
出处
《日语学习与研究》
2012年第4期21-27,共7页
Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research