期刊文献+

关键因素构建WPBL学习效果评价方法研究 被引量:1

Evaluation Method about the Learning Effect of Web-based PBL with Key Factors Simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用关键因素构建WPBL学习效果综合评价模型并进行实证研究。方法从广州医学院开展WPBL教学模式的学生中随机抽取10%学生,发放调查问卷,利用聚类分析挑选评价变量。用因子分析法提取公因子,用公因子的方差贡献率作为综合评价模型的权重,并给出其对学习效果评价的合理解释。按关键因素构建出综合评价模型,开展综合评价。结果以特征值大于1为标准提取出四个公因子,方差累积贡献率达到64.99%。以方差贡献率作为综合评价函数的权重,构建出综合评价模型:E=K1+K2+K3+…+Kj(j=1,2,…,m)。利用综合评价模型对WPBL学习效果进行综合评价。结论采用关键因素构建综合评价模型评价WPBL学习效果是可行的。这些关键因素能从四个方面对WPBL学习效果进行量化。 Objective This paper aims to use components as the key factors to explore the feasibility of evaluation method about the learning effect of Web-based PBL. Dummy variables were introduced to solve the problem of multicollinearity between the variables. The variance contribution rate Used as weights to make an objective evaluation of teach- ing effective evaluation of WPBL learning effect. Methods We distribu- ted a questionnaire to 101 students of clinical bilingual class of 2007and 2008 grade in Guangzhou Medical University. Cranach's a coefficient is used to evaluate intrinsic consistency reliability of the questionnaire. Aver- age Between-groups linkage was used to hierarchical clustering. We applied principal component analysis to extract components and to explain compo- nents which were orthogonally rotated by varimax. Results The questionnaire's intrinsic consistency reliability Cranach's a coefficient is 0. 85. Four components are extracted with Eigen values greater than 1, the cumulative contribution rate is 64. 99%. Comprehensive evaluation model is expressed as:E=K1 +K2 +K3 + … +Kj(j = 1,2,... ,m) Four compo- nents which are orthogonally rotated by varimax are interpreted as collective collaboration capabilities Self-learning and quest skills, clinical reasoning and problem-solving capabilities, memorizing and understanding of medical knowledge. And students' learning effect is well evaluated. Conclusion This paper demonstrates that using components as the key factors to simu- late and assessing the Web-based PBL learning effect is feasible,which as- sesses the Web-based PBL learning effect well from four different aspects.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期538-541,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金 广州市教育科学十二五规划课题(11A002)
关键词 关键因素 网络式PBL 综合评价模型 因子分析 Key factors simulation Web -PBL Com-prehensive evaluation model Factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘利平,方定志.PBL教学方法的调查和探索[J].医学教育探索,2006,5(1):95-96. 被引量:129
  • 2张绪美,董元华,石浚哲,王辉.聚类因子分析在太湖水质参数评价中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(6):58-62. 被引量:22
  • 3邹景忠.渤海湾富营养化和赤潮问题初步探讨[J].海洋环境科学,1983,2(2):41-45.
  • 4Bloom B. Taxonomy of educational objectives : I cognitive domain. London : Longman, 1956 : 189-189.
  • 5Blake JM, Norman GR, Keane DR, et al. "Introducing progress testing in McMaster University's problem-based medical curriculum:psychometric properties and effect on learning". Acad Med,1996(71) :1002-1007.
  • 6Schmidt HG. Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ, 1983 ( 17 ) : 11-16.
  • 7Wood DF. Problem based learning, Bmj,2003(326) :328-330.
  • 8Michel M C, Bischoff A,Jakobs K H. Comparison of problem-and lecture-based pharmacology teaching. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2002,23 (4) : 168-170.
  • 9Stephen Atherton, Zolten H Endre, Gcorgo Pang. Design & Implementation of Internet-based Multimedia Tutorials for Medical Teaching. [EB/OL]. (2001-11-01). http://www. gu. edu. au/ archive/qnet97/thu0130pml/sld001.htm.
  • 10Hassan Khan, Ather M. Problem-based versus conventional curricula: influence on knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards health research. Plos ONE, 2007, 2 (7) : e632-e632.

共引文献38

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部