期刊文献+

磷化氢对不同地理种群谷蠹成虫体内3种保护酶的影响 被引量:1

Effect of Phosphine on Three Protective Enzymes in the Lesser Grain Borer in Different Geographical Populations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对不同地理种群谷蠹成虫体内过氧化氢酶(CAT),超氧化物歧化酶(SOD),过氧化物酶(POD)的活性研究表明:熏蒸前,不同地理种群的谷蠹成虫体内3种保护酶的活性不同;使用磷化氢进行熏蒸处理后,不同地理种群谷蠹体内的3种保护酶活性的变化规律为:SOD活力升高,POD和CAT活性降低。采用SPSS 16.0分别对熏蒸前试验种群的致死中浓度(LC50)及3种酶活性两两变量进行相关性分析,结果表明:试验种群的LC50与CAT之间存在显著简单相关性(P=0.031<0.05);LC50与SOD,POD两种酶活性不存在显著相关性(P=0.545;0.053>0.05);CAT及POD之间存在简单相关性(P=0.034<0.05)。 The activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) were ob- served in the grain borer adult in different geographical population. The activities of CAT, POD and SOD showed difference among populations in R. dominica adults before fumigation. The results showed that the activities of CAT and POD in different population of adults decreased after fumigation treatment, while the activities of SOD enhanced. The activity of CAT in different populations had expressed significant simple correlation with the lethal concentration (LCs0) of R. dominica populations (P = 0.031 〈 0.05 ) ;Meanwhile, there were no significant correlation between the SOD, POD and the LCs0 three enzyme activities before fumigation (P =0. 545 ;0. 053 〉0.05 ) ,while the CAT activity showed simple correlation with the POD activity (P = 0.034 〈 0.05 ).
出处 《中国粮油学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期73-78,共6页 Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD02A18-03 2006BAI09B04-06)
关键词 过氧化氢酶 超氧化物歧化酶 过氧化物酶 磷化氢抗性 谷蠹 catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, phosphine resistance, grain borer
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1陈耀溪.仓库害虫(增订本)[M].北京:农业出版社,1985:126-133.
  • 2WMO. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion : World Mete- orological Organization Report no. 25 [ C ] Geneva: World Me- teorological Organization of the United Nations, 1991.
  • 3Danse L H J C,van Velsen F L,van der Heijden C A. Methyl bromide : carcinogenic effects in the rat forestomach [ J ]. Toxi- cology and Applied Pharmacology, 1984,72:262 - 271.
  • 4Champ B R, Dyte C E. Report of the FAO global survey of pesticide susceptibility of stored grain pests [ M ]//Champ B R FAO plant production and protection series ; no, 5 : FAO : Rome, 1976:260 - 297.
  • 5Chaudhry M Q. Phosphine resistance:a growing threat to an i- deal fumigant[ J]. Pesticide Outlook,2000 (7) ,88 - 91.
  • 6Collins P J,Daglish G J,Pavic H,et al. Response of mixed - age cultures of phosphine - resistant and susceptible strains of lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica, to phosphine at a range of concentrations and exposure periods [ J ]. Journal of Stored Products Research ,2005,41:373 - 385.
  • 7Pimentel M A G. , Faroni L R D'A, Totola M R, et al. Phos- phine resisitant, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored -product insects [ J ]. Pest Management Science ,2007, 63 : 876 - 881.
  • 8Pimentel M A G, Faroni L R D'A, Guedes R N C, et al. Phospine resistance in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky ( Coleoptera: Curculionidae ) [ J ]. Journal of Stored Products Research,2009,45:71 - 74.
  • 9曹阳,刘梅,郑彦昌.五种储粮害虫11个品系的磷化氢抗性测定[J].粮食储藏,2003,32(2):9-11. 被引量:26
  • 10严晓平,黎万武,刘作伟,覃章贵,吴秀琼,宋永成,沈兆鹏.我国主要储粮害虫抗性调查研究[J].粮食储藏,2004,33(4):17-19. 被引量:58

二级参考文献91

共引文献381

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部