远程英语教学中的书面更正性反馈有效性研究被引量：2

Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback in Distance English Teaching

导出

摘要本研究通过历时12周、共计100名远程英语学习者参与的教学实验和问卷调查,探讨通过书面更正性反馈提高远程英语学习者使用英语一般过去时和过去完成时的正确率的有效性问题。参与者被分为三组,组1获得只含有正确答案的直接反馈,组2获得只含有元语言信息的间接反馈,对照组不获得任何反馈。前测、及时后测以及10周后的延时后测成绩对比结果显示,实验组的及时后测和延时后测成绩均明显高于前测成绩,而控制组成绩无显著变化。这说明更正性反馈能有效提高学习者使用两种时态的准确性。随后的问卷调查揭示了远程学习者对待更正性反馈的态度。本研究进一步证实了对于成人远程英语学习者而言,书面更正性反馈是有效的,且直接反馈效果优于间接反馈效果。 The current study was undertaken,through an experiment of three-month study(with 100 adult distant EFL learners) and a questionnaire survey,to investigate whether written corrective feedback(WCF) is effective in improving distant EFL learners' use of English tenses of Simple Past and Past Perfect and its effectiveness over time.The learners were divided into three groups,Group One receiving direct feedback containing correct target form only,Group two receiving indirect feedback containing metalinguistic cues but no correct target form,and the control group left unattended.The scores of the three groups in the pretest before the treatments,immediate-post and delayed-post test after the treatments were analyzed and compared.The results show that learners from two experimental groups which received the WCF outperformed the controlled group which did not receive WCF,indicating that WCF helped learners improve their accurate use of English Simple Past tense and Past Perfect tense and the effectiveness of WCF was retained over ten weeks.Besides,the groups receiving direct feedback outperformed the group receiving indirect feedback.A questionnaire that followed revealed learners' general attitudes towards the way WCF is given.In sum,the current study lends further support to the effectiveness of WCF and also indicates that there is a clear advantage for direct corrective feedback over the indirect corrective feedback for distance EFL learners.

作者谭翔宇

机构地区上海电视大学外语系

出处《中国远程教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第15期38-44,95,共7页 Chinese Journal of Distance Education

基金上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金"远程英语教学中更正性反馈的调查与研究"项目(编号:dsd09003)

关键词书面更正性反馈远程英语教学远程学习者 written corrective feedback Simple Past Past Perfect grammatical accuracy distance English teaching

分类号 G642.0 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multi-draft composition classroom: ls content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? [J] Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3):227-257.
2Bithchener. (2008) Evidence in support of written corrective feedback[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing. 17(2): 102-118.
3Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008) The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research[J]. 12 (3): 409-431.
4Chandler, J. (2000). The effic, acy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing [C]. Paper presented at the AAAL conference, Vancouver, B.C.
5Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J}. Journal of Second Language Writing, (12): 267-296.
6Ellis, R. (1994) Studies on Second Language Acquisition[M}. Oxford: Oxford University Press:42-45,.
7Ellis,R. (2009)A typology of written corrective tedback types[J].ELT lournal, 63(2):97-107.
8Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (28):339-368.
9Ferris, D. R. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors?[J] CATESOL Journal, (8): 41-62.
10Fen'is, D.R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.

二级参考文献29

1杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量：170
2Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 227-257.
3Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kind of er ror feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267-296.
4Doughty, C. &J. Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
5Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
6Fathman, A. &E. Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing, Focus on form versus content [A]. In B. Kroll (ed.). Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom [C]. Cambridge, CUP. 178-190.
7Ferris, D. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 Writing classes: A response to Truscott [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
8Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be [J]? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161- 184.
10Ferris, D., S. Chaney, K. Komura, B. Roberts&S. McKee. 2000. Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error [R]. In Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention, Vancouver, March 14-18.