摘要
王引之《经义述闻.周易》之部成就卓著。唯智者千虑,难免一失。通过对《经义述闻.周易》之部中五则辨析经义文字的分析,我们发现其存在四个方面的疏失或缺憾:第一是未明《周易》文例;第二是未明《经》、《传》之差异性;第三是未明汉注术语;第四是未明甲骨文。前二项属于易学之范畴,后二项则为训诂学之领域。可见训解《周易》之不易,即使精于训诂如王氏父子者,亦不能无所疏漏或遗憾。
This paper provides five amendments to WANG Yin-zhi~ Jing Yi Shu Wen ~ Zhouyi. The five instances can be attributed to the following four errors: lack of knowledge of Zhouyi textual examples; lack of knowledge of the differences between old Text and commentaries ; lack of understanding of Han Dynasty seholium terminologies; lack of the opportunity to understand Oracle bone script. The former two belong to the realm of Yi school of thought, the latter two belong to the category of scholium studies. From this, the difficulties in interpretation of Zhouyi can be seen, even those so highly proficient, like WANG Nian-Sun and WANG Yin-Zhi, are still liable to error.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期37-48,共12页
Studies of Zhouyi
基金
香港政府研究资助局优配研究金资助项目:"王引之<经义述闻>斠正"(143808)