摘要
嵇康与阮籍崇尚自然,追求自由,以放任狂诞的人格姿态反抗虚伪礼法对人性的戕害。相比之下,嵇康洁身自好、愤世嫉俗,而阮籍则随波逐流、和光同尘。将两人合观,我们可以对庄学"自然"范畴在主体性层面的内涵的二重性获得一个较为完整的理解。
Both Ji Kang and Ruan Ji advocate nature, pursue freedom, and take indulgent attitudes against the harm caused by the hypocrisy of rites to human nature. By comparison, Ji Kang preserves his moral integrity and tends to be cynical; while Ruan Ji drifts with the current and refrains from making showy display. Examining these two persons together, we can acquire comprehensive understandings of the dual connotation of Zhuangzi＇s ＂nature＂ category on the subject side.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期82-91,共10页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词
竹林玄学
名教
自然
放任狂诞
二重性
Bamboo metaphysics
reputation and enlightenment
nature
indulgence
duality
