期刊文献+

弹性边界试验获取自由状态频响方法研究 被引量:2

Extraction of free body frequency response functions from elastically constrained test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大型柔性航天结构的一阶频率可能低至0.1 Hz,采用自由悬吊方法进行结构自由状态频响测试难以满足要求,因为它要求悬吊频率远低于待测结构的一阶频率。为解决这一问题,文章研究了弹性边界试验方法:对待测结构施加弹性支撑,在分别获得整体与支撑结构频响后,通过频域子结构解耦方法,去除支撑结构对待测结构的影响,以得到待测结构自由状态的频响。试验结果表明,这一方法是可行的,可以考虑进一步应用于实际工程结构。 A large scale structure might have a very low first natural frequency,as low as 0.1 Hz.Traditionally,the method of the low stiffness suspension is a standard method for the modal test of structures.A requirement on the suspension stiffness is that the suspension frequency should be much lower than the first flexible natural frequency of the tested structure.For the large scale structure,a very long suspension spring is required to achieve the required frequency.This low frequency requirement might not be able to be met in many labs.In this paper,a method is proposed to deal with the above problem by replacing the low stiffness suspension with a group of supports that can have any stiffness.By removing the influence of the support stiffness from the computation with the measured frequency responses,the structure’s real modal parameters can be obtained conveniently.Experimental examples are given.
出处 《航天器环境工程》 2012年第4期414-418,共5页 Spacecraft Environment Engineering
基金 装备预研基金资助项目(编号:9140A20020610HT0506)
关键词 地面试验 子结构解耦 界面力识别 ground test substructure decoupling interface force identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Wada B K,Lou M. Pre-flight validation of gossamer structures[A].Colorado,USA,2002.
  • 2Mays R L. Combining lightly damped experimental substructures with analytical substructures[A].2007.
  • 3Mays R L,Hunter P S,Simmermacher T W. Combining experimental and analytical substructures with multiple connections[A].2008.
  • 4D’Ambrogio W,Fregolent A. Decoupling procedures in the general framework of frequency based substructuring[A].2009.
  • 5D'Ambrogio W,Fregolent A. The role of interface DoFs in decoupling of substructures based on the dual domain decomposition[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2010.2035-2048.
  • 6Sj?vall P,Abrahamsson T. Substructure system identification from coupled system test data[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2008,(01):15-33.
  • 7Jetmundsen B,Bielawa R L,Flanelly W G. Generalized frequency domain substructure synthesis[J].Journal of the American Helicopter Society,1988,(01):55-64.
  • 8de Klerk D,Rixen D J,Voormeeren S N. General framework for dynamic substructuring:history,review,and classification of techniques[J].AIAA Journal,2008,(05).

同被引文献37

  • 1李刚,关富玲.环形桁架展开天线索网的预拉力优化技术及工程应用[J].固体力学学报,2006,27(S1):174-179. 被引量:18
  • 2洪嘉振.计算多体系统动力学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009:38-40.
  • 3FOWELL A R, WANG G H. Precision pointing of the Thuraya satellite [C]. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 2003, 113: 455-469.
  • 4PRZEMIENIECKI J S. Theory of matrix structural analysis [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
  • 5CHEN S H, LIU Z S. Determining free-free modes from experimental data of constrained structures [J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2): 357-359.
  • 6ZHANG O, ZERVA A. Extraction of free-free modes using constrained test data [J]. AIAA Journal, 1995, 33(12): 2440-2442.
  • 7HAN W Z, CHEN S H, GUO Y G. Improved method for determining free-free modes using constrained test data [J].AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(2): 400-402.
  • 8WADA B K, KUO C P, GLASER R J. Extension of ground-based testing for large space structure [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, 1986, 23(2): 184-188.
  • 9GLASER R J, KUO C P, WADA B K. Multiple boundary condition testing error analysis [C]. 30th AIAA/ASM/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structure, Structural Dynamic and Material Conference, AIAA 1989-1162, 1989.
  • 10MAYS R L, STASIUNAS E C. Combining lightly damped experimental substructures with analytical substructures [C]. Proceedings of the 25th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC-XXV), Orlando, Florida, USA, Feb., 2007.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部