自由判断余地原则:欧洲经验及其域外适用被引量：2

Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation:European Experience and its Extraterritorial Application

导出

摘要根据欧洲人权机制在实践中发展出来的自由判断余地原则,国际人权监督机构要尊重缔约国在履行人权公约义务时的自由裁量权,尽管这种裁量权最终要受到国际人权监督机构的审查。自由判断余地原则旨在解决国家主权与国际监督的平衡问题,因而对联合国人权条约机制具有一定的域外借鉴意义。目前,在适用自由判断余地原则方面,经济、社会和文化权利委员会的态度比较积极,但人权事务委员会的态度却不甚明朗。自由判断余地原则应该在联合国人权条约机制中发挥更重要的作用。 Doctrine of margin of appreciation derived from cases of European human rights system means that international monitoring bodies should respect state party＇s discretionary power when they perform the obligations under human rights conventions. At the same time, this kind of discretionary power should be reviewed by international monitoring bodies. Doctrine of margin of appreciation aims to keep the balance between state sovereignty and international monitoring and can provide extraterritorial significance for United Nations human rights system based on treaty. In current practice, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural rights takes positive attitudes towards this doctrine while the attitude of Committee on Human Rights is unclear. In the future, this doctrine should be used and play more important role in United Nations human rights system based on treaty.

作者毛俊响

机构地区中南大学法学院

出处《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期65-70,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

关键词自由判断余地国际监督国家主权 doctrine of margin of appreciation international monitoring state sovereignty.

分类号 D998.2 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Howard Charles Yourow, TheMarginofAppreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996, p. 13.
2Handyside v. the United Kingdom, ECHR, Judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A, No. 24, para. 48.
3Cora S. Feingold, Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation and the European Convention on Human Rights, in Notre Dame Lawyer, Vol. 53, 1977-1978, p. 92.
4孙世彦.欧洲人权制度中的“自由判断余地原则”述评[J].环球法律评论,2005,27(3):372-384. 被引量：13
5J. G. Merrills, The Development of International law by the European Court of Human rights, Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, 1988, p. 136.
6Eyal Benverfisti, Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards, in New York University Journal of International Lawand Politics, Vol. 31, 1999, p. 844.
7Jeffrey A. Brauch, The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law, in Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 11, 2004-2005, pp. 125-150.
8James A Sweeney, Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and The European Court of Human Rights in The Post-Cold War Era, in International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, 2005, p. 462.
9Yuval Shany, Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? in The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, 2006, pp. 928-940.
10Dominic McGoldriek, The Human Rights Committee: It's Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, p. 467.

二级参考文献85

1Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, Judgment 23 September 1982, Series A, no. 52, para. 69.
2Powell and Rayner v. UK,Judgment of 21 February 1990 ,Series A, no. 172, para. 44.
3James and Others v. UK,Judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A, no. 98, paros. 46 - 50,para.50.
4Sφbren C. Prebensen, "The Margin of Appreciation and Articles 9,10 and 11 of the Convention" ,19 Human Rights L. J. 13 ,pp. 14 - 15,p.17(1998).
5Lord Lester of Herne Hill, Q. C. ," Universality versus Subsidiarity :A Reply", 1998 - 1 European Human Rights Law Review 73 ,pp.75-76,p.76(1998).
6Muller and Others v. Switzerland, Judgment of 24 May 1988,Series A,no. 133.
7Brannigan and McBride v. UK, Judgment of 26 May 1993, Series A, no. 258 - B, parer. 43.
8Eyal Benvenlsti " Margin of Appreciation,Consensus, and Universal Standards" ,31 New York University School of Law J. Int' l L. & Politics 843, p. 845 ( 1999 ).
9Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v UK,Judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A94, para. 67.
10Gustafsson v. Sweden,Judgment of 25 April 1996, E. H. R. R. 1996 -Ⅱ, paras.52 -54.