期刊文献+

知觉负荷对注意缺损多动障碍儿童过滤分心刺激能力的影响

The Effect of Perceptual Load on Filtering Distractors in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究选取了注意缺损多动障碍儿童34名,普通儿童36名,采用选择性注意任务,考察在目标刺激的知觉负荷高低两种情况下,注意缺损多动障碍儿童面对不同干扰程度的分心刺激时,对其的过滤能力是否落后。结果发现,注意缺损多动障碍儿童过滤分心刺激的能力是否落后取决于目标刺激的知觉负荷的高低:(1)在低知觉负荷任务中,不相容分心刺激对两组儿童的干扰程度要大于面对中性分心刺激时受到的干扰。但是注意缺损多动障碍组儿童受到的干扰效应要大于普通组儿童,说明注意缺损多动障碍组儿童过滤分心刺激的能力落后,并出现在注意选择的晚期阶段;(2)在高知觉负荷任务中,所有被试都没有因为分心刺激干扰程度的不同而受到不同的影响,即过滤中性分心刺激与不相容分心刺激的模式一样。 This study, by using the selective attention task to survey 34 children with attention deficit hyper- activity disorder (ADHD) and 36 normal children, aims to explore the fdtering distractors in the ADHD children under heavy and light perceptual loads. The results show that the ADHD children' s ability in filtering distractors depends on the perceptual load. ( 1 ) Under the light perceptual load, the incompatible distractors show more in- terventions in the two groups of children than the neutral distractors. However, the ADHD children sense more interventions than the normal children, which indicates that the ADHD children are backward in their ability in filtering distractors at the late stage of attention selection. (2) Under the heavy perceptual load, neither of the two groups of children is affected by the filtering distractors at different degrees, that is, the central distractors have the same pattern with the incompatible distractors.
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期43-48,共6页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 北京市"十一五"教育科学规划重点课题"注意缺损多动症儿童认知机制及干预研究"(项目批准号:ACA08019)的项目成果
关键词 注意缺损多动障碍 知觉负荷分心刺激 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) perceptual load distractors
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statis- tical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th ed (DSM - IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1994.80.
  • 2Klimkeit E I, Mattingley J B, Sheppard D M, et al. Motor preparation, motor execution, attention, and ex- ecutive functions in attention deficit/hyperactivity disor- der (ADHD). Child Neuropsychology, 2005, 11 (2) : 153 - 73.
  • 3Carter C S, Krener P, Chaderjian M, et al. Abnormal processing of irrelevant information in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 1995, 56 (1), 59-70.
  • 4Satterfield J H, Schell A M, Nicolas T. Preferential neural processing of attended stimuli in attention - deft- cit/hyperactivity disorder and normal boys. Psychophysi- ology, 1994,31 (1) : 1 - 10.
  • 5Taylor M J, Sunohara G A, Khan S C, et al. Parallel and serial attentional processes in ADHD: ERP evi- dence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 1997.13 (4) : 531 - 539.
  • 6Nigg J T. Neuropsychologic theory and findings in At- tention - Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: the state of the field and salient challenges for the coming decade. Biol- ogy of Psychiatry,2005,57 : 1424 - 1435.
  • 7Pritchard V E, Neumann E, Rucklidge J J. Selective attention and inhibitory deficits in ADHD: does snhty- peor comorbidity modulate negative priming effects? Brain and Cognition, 2008,67 : 324 - 339.
  • 8Treisman A M. Strategies and models of selective atten- tion. Psychological Review, 1969,76 : 282 - 299.
  • 9Duncan J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 1980,87 : 272 - 300.
  • 10Lavie N, Hirst A, De Fockert J W, et al. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133 (3) :339-354.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部