期刊文献+

舍曲林联用小剂量舒必利治疗躯体形式障碍的疗效观察 被引量:3

Comparative Study of Sulpiride Combined with Sertraline in the Treatment of Somatoform Disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究舍曲林联合小剂量舒必利与单用舍曲林治疗躯体形式障碍的临床疗效。方法:86例躯体形式障碍患者随机分为两组各43例,研究组予舍曲林合并舒必利治疗,对照组单用舍曲林治疗。治疗前与治疗12周后采用汉密尔顿焦虑表(HAMA)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI)、副反应量表(TESS)观察评定;比较2组疗效及不良反应发生率。结果:研究组在治疗后2,4,8,12周的HAMA总分和躯体性焦虑因子分明显低于对照组(P<0.05或0.01),减分率明显高于对照组(P<0.05或0.01)。治疗12周后研究组临床总有效率为83.7%,显著高于对照组58.1%(P<0.01);研究组不良反应发生率为20.9%,对照组为25.6%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:舍曲林联合舒必利治疗躯体形式障碍较单用舍曲林具有起效快、疗效好等优点。 Objective:To study the clinical effects of sulpiride combined with sertraline and sertraline single on the treatment of somatoform disorders. Methods:86 patients with somatoform disorders were randomly divided into two groups. One group (study group N = 43 ) was treated with sulpiride combined with sertraline and the other group (con- trolled group N = 43 ) , treated with sertraline only. The efficacy and safety were assessed with HAMA, CGI and TESS. The effective rate and side effect rate were compared between the two groups. Results:HAMA total score and HAMA-SOM fac- tor score were significantly lower in sulpiride combined group than those in the controlled group at the end of weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 of the treatment( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ). The effective rate was 83.7% in sulpiride combined group and 58.1% in the controlled group( P 〈 0.05 ). The side effect rate was 20.9% in sulpiride combined group and 25.6% in the controlled group. There was no difference between the two groups. Conclusion:Sertraline combined with sulpiride was more effective than sertraline monotherapy in the treatment of somatoform disorders.
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2012年第7期319-321,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 舍曲林 舒必利 躯体形式障碍 Sertraline Sulpiride Somatoform disorders
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1吴彩云 陈学诗.躯体型障碍.现代精神疾病治疗学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1997.372-379.
  • 2中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3[M].济南:山东科技出版社,2001.97-99.
  • 3中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)[M].济南:山东科技出版社,2001.140-164.
  • 4Tacchini G, Musazzi A, Recchia M, et al. The present nosography of somatoform disorders: Results of the Italian epidemiological study of somatoform disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 1995, 5: 175-176.
  • 5Kebede D, Alem A. Major mental disorders in Addis Ababa,Ethiopia Ⅲ: Neurotic and somatoform disorders. Acta Psychiatr Stand Suppl, 1999, 397: 9-24.
  • 6Leibbrand R, Hiller W, Fichter M. Effect of comorbid anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders on treatment outcome of somatoform disorders. Compra Psychiatry, 1999, 40: 203-209.
  • 7Hardy P. Epidemiology of somatoform disorders in the general French population. Encephala, 1995, 21:191-9.
  • 8Snyder S, Strain J. Somatoform disorders in the general hospital inpatient setting. General hospital psychiatry, 1989, 11:288-93.
  • 9Yutzy Sh, Cloninger R, Guze SB, et al. DSM-4 field trial:Testing a new proposal for somatization disorder. Am J Psychiatry, 1995, 152:97-101.
  • 10Kapthammer HP. Somatization-somatoform disorders-etiopathological models. Fortsehr Neurol Psychiatr, 2001, 69:58-77.

共引文献302

同被引文献21

  • 1沈渔邨.精神病学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2009:838.
  • 2吴江.神经病学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:8.
  • 3Pauli P,Alpers G W.Memory bias in patients with hypochondriasis and somatoform pain disorder[J] .J Psychosom Res,2002,52:45-53.
  • 4Martin A,Buech A,Schwenk C,et al.Memory bias for health-related information in somatoform disorders[J] .Journal of Psychosomatic Research,2007,63(6):663-671.
  • 5世界卫生组织.疾病及有关健康问题的国际分类之精神与行为障碍分类标准第10版[M].范肖东,汪向东,于欣,等译.北京:人民卫生出版社,1993 :129.
  • 6DE GRECK M, BOLTER AF, LEHMANN L, et al. Changes inbrain activity of somatoform disorder patients during emotionalempathy after multimodal psychodynamic psychotherapy [ J ].Front Hum Neurosci,2013,7 :410.
  • 7FREIDL M,PIRALIC-SPITZL S,GR0HE N,et al. Associationbetween fear of stigma, depressive and anxiety symptoms inpatients with somatoform pain disorder[ J]. Psychiatr Prax,2012,39(6) :263.
  • 8孟凡强,崔玉华,沈渔村,林凯,侯冬芬,戚元丽,金太光,孙春云,唐亮,程卫国.综合医院躯体形式障碍临床特点的初步研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(2):67-69. 被引量:120
  • 9李勇,贺丹军,吴玉琴,杨宁波,王昊飞.躯体形式障碍患者临床特征的对照研究[J].中华全科医学,2011,9(8):1258-1260. 被引量:8
  • 10方泽忠,华玖州,朱宇馨.无抽搐电休克合并舍曲林治疗躯体形式障碍的对照研究[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2012,32(3):328-329. 被引量:3

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部