期刊文献+

T_3T_4期鼻咽癌两种推量放疗的近期疗效分析 被引量:1

Analysis of short-term efficacy of boost radiotherapy for T_3 and T_4 Stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨伽玛刀和三维适形放疗推量放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的近期疗效。方法选择局部晚期(T3T4期)鼻咽癌患者120例,随机进入伽玛刀推量组(伽玛刀组)40例、3D-CRT推量组(3D-CRT组)40例、调强放射治疗(IMRT)组40例。IMRT组患者采用IMRT技术,鼻咽部大体肿瘤靶区(GTVnx)和其临床靶区(CTV1)的处方剂量分别为76Gy~78Gy和64Gy;颈部转移淋巴结(GTVnd)和其临床靶区(CTV2)的处方剂量分别为64Gy~72Gy和60Gy。伽玛刀组和3D-CRT组患者接受相同方式的常规外照射,鼻咽部剂量为70Gy,针对鼻咽原发灶进行推量治疗,研究组用伽玛刀推量治疗6Gy~10Gy,对照组用3D-CRT推量治疗6Gy~10Gy。结果放疗后3个月和6个月的肿瘤完全消退率与推量方式有关系,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05、P<0.01),伽玛刀组明显优于IM-RT组和3D-CRT组;口干、放射性外耳炎、失眠等放疗急性不良反应与推量方式有关系,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),IMRT组的放疗急性不良反应明显低于伽玛刀组和3D-CRT组;伽玛刀组的放射性外耳炎和失眠的发生率分别为15.0%和12.5%,明显低于3D-CRT组的35.0%和37.5%,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05、P<0.01)。结论常规放疗+伽玛刀推量治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌可以提高肿瘤完全消退率,有可能提高局部控制率,减少放射治疗的并发症。 Objective to study the clinical outcomes of the locally advanced nasopharyngeal carci- noma (NPC) patients received boost radiotherapy by either gamma knife or 3D-CRT compared with intensity modulation radiation (IMRT). Methods 120 locally advanced (T3 or Tn ) NPC patients were random allo- cated into gamma knife boost group (gamma knife group), 3D-CRT boost group (3D-CRT group), or IM- RT group. There were 40 patients in each group. Patients in IMRT group received IMRT treatment. DTs de- livered to GTVnx, CTV1, GTVnd, and CTV2 were 76Gy-78Gy, 64Gy, 64Gy-72Gy, and 60Gy, respective- ly. Before boost, patients in gamma knife group and 3D-CRT group received conventional radiotherapy. DT for nasopharyngeal was 70Gy. 6Gy-10Gy were boosted to nasopharyngeal with gamma knife or 3D-CRT ac- cording to their groups. Results complete response rate in gamma knife group was higher than IMRT group or 3D-CRT group. The differences were significant (P 〈 0. 05, P 〈 0. 01 ). Acute side effects such as dry- ness, otitis external, insomnia were significantly different among the groups (P 〈 0. 01 ). Acute side effects in IMRT group were lower than gamma knife group and 3D-CRT group. The incidence rates of otitis external and insomnia were 15.0% and 12. 5% which were significant lower than 35.0% (P 〈 0.05) and 37.5% (P 〈 0. 01 ) in 3D-CRT group. Conclusions gamma knife boost combined with conventional radiotherapy for locally advanced NPC patients could improve complete response rate. It may develop locally control rate as well as decrease radiation side effects.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2012年第4期348-350,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 放射治疗 伽玛刀 推量治疗 调强放疗 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Radiotherapy Gamma knife Boost Intensitymodulation radiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1宗井凤,马骏,唐玲珑,黄莹,刘立志,林爱华,崔念基,卢泰祥.鼻咽癌综合治疗策略研究——749例疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤,2005,14(8):538-542. 被引量:46
  • 2高剑铭,曾益新,崔念基,卢泰祥,赵充,夏云飞,马骏,谢方云.915例单纯根治性放疗鼻咽癌分期系统比较及建议(一)——对'92福州分期的校验[J].癌症,2005,24(10):1165-1172. 被引量:34
  • 3孔琳,张有望,吴永如,郭小毛.鼻咽癌放疗后长期生存者晚期副反应研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(3):153-156. 被引量:72
  • 4潘建基,洪金省,张瑜.鼻咽癌常规外照射致后组颅神经损伤的危险因素研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2006,26(5):490-493. 被引量:18
  • 5Heng DMK,Wee J,Fong KW,et al. Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer, 1999,86 : 1912-1920.
  • 6Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, et al. Is the 1997 AJCC stage system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognostically useful for Chinese patient populations?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2001,50 : 1181-1189.
  • 7Chan ATC,Teo PML, Ngan RK, et al. Concurrent chemotherapyradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in localregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma;progression-free survival analysis of a phase Ⅲ randomized trial. J Clin Oncol,2002,20:2038- 2044.
  • 8Brizel DM,Dodge RK, Clough RW,et al. Oxygenation of head and neck cancer: changes during radiotherapy and impact on treatment outcome. Radiother Oncol, 1999,53 : 113-117.
  • 9Glaser CM, Millesi W, Kornek GV, et al. Impact of hemoglobin level and use of recombinant erythropoietin on efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity and oropharynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001,50: 705-715.
  • 10Zhang EP,Lian PG,Cai KL,et al.Radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:prognostic factors based on a 10-year follow-up of 1302 patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1989,16:301-305.

共引文献127

同被引文献5

  • 1LI MY, LIU JQ, CHEN DP, et al. A comparative study on gly-cididazole sodium combined with radiochemotherapy in treatingpatients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014,15(6) :2641-2646.
  • 2BRAGA FP, LEMOS JUNIO CA, ALVES FA, et al. Acupunc-ture for the prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in pa-tients with head and neck cancer [J].Braz Oral Res, 2011,25(2)..180-185.
  • 3CAO CN, LUO JW,GAO L, et al. Clinical outcomes and patternsof failure after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for T4 nasopha-ryngeal carcinoma [J].Oral Oncol, 2013,49(2) : 175-181.
  • 4韩非,肖巍魏,王汉渝,黄莹,邓美玲,赵充,卢泰祥.适形调强放疗对鼻咽肿瘤退缩模式的影响[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2012,32(2):204-206. 被引量:7
  • 5陈冬平,齐斌,余意,刘锦全.鼻咽癌远期生存率及预后因素分析[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28(12):1999-2001. 被引量:19

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部