期刊文献+

欧盟司法审查体系及其借鉴意义论析 被引量:1

Judicial Review System of European Union and Its Referring Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧盟的司法审查体系是应欧盟跨国区域共同治理的需要而建立的审查机制,它包括对欧盟机构法令的审查、对欧盟机构不作为的审查、对成员国行为的审查以及预先裁决程序。对欧盟机构法令的审查和不作为的审查,可以最大程度地确保欧盟机构的立法与决策符合欧盟基本条约的规定,并保护欧盟法律主体的合法权益不受欧盟机构非法或不当行为的损害。对成员国行为的审查可以促进成员国善意履行欧盟条约的义务。预先裁决程序通过对欧盟法律的解释解决了欧盟法在成员国的适用问题,促进了欧盟法与成员国国内法之间的合作。文章通过剖析欧盟的司法审查制度探讨了其对区域合作的借鉴意义。 The judicial review system of European Union (EU) caters to the transnational governance of the European integration. The EU judicial review system includes the review of the institutional acts, review of the omission of the EU institutes, review of actions of the member states, and the preliminary ruling. The review of institutional acts and omission may greatly guarantee the conformity of the institutional legislation and policy with the basic treaties of EU, and protect the rights of the EU subjects from injury arising out of the illegal or unreasonable acts of the EU institutes. The review of the action of the member states may enforce the member states' intention to perform the obligation under the basic treaties. The preliminary reference procedure, through construction of the EU law, determines the applicability of the EU law in the member states, facilitating the cooperation of the EU law and national law. This article probes into the referring value of the EU judicial review system for the regional integrity.
作者 刘会春
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第8期33-37,共5页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 司法审查 机构法令 成员国行为 预先裁决 欧盟 judicial review institutional acts action of member states preliminary ruling EU
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1伍贻康.欧盟治理模式的特征和发展态势[J].世界经济研究,2008(5):25-29. 被引量:5
  • 2曾令良欧洲联盟法总论:以欧洲宪法条约为新视角[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:279-280.
  • 3德尼·西蒙.欧盟法律体系[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 4赵西臣.欧盟法中的司法审查制度:对《欧共体条约》第230条的释读[M]∥王斯曼.北大法律评论.北京:北京大学出版社,2005,6(2):608.
  • 5DANIEL PIAXOLO. EU Integration of Transition Coun- tries: Overlap of Requisites and Remaining Tasks [ J ]. Intereconomics ,2000,35 ( 11 ) :271.
  • 6张华.欧洲一体化与初步裁决制度的互动性剖析[J].国际论坛,2005,7(1):69-73. 被引量:4
  • 7方国学,薛向君.天平与杠杆--欧盟的司法制度[M].南昌:江西高校出版社,2006:214.
  • 8约瑟夫·威勒.欧洲宪政[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Jo Shaw, Law of the European Union, Palgrave MacMillan Press, 2000, p. 397,415-418.
  • 2Case C-322/88 Grimaldi v. Fonds des Maladies Professionnelles[1989] ECR 4407.pp.398-400.
  • 3Case36/73 NV Nederlandse Spoorwegen v. Minister van Verkeer en Waterstaat[1973] ECR 1299, para. of 1313-1320.
  • 4Case 29/68 Milch-Fett-und Eierkontor v. HZA Saarbrücken[1969] ECR 165.
  • 5[德]贝娅特·科勒-科赫 顾俊礼译.《欧洲一体化与欧盟治理》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2004年版.第15-17页.
  • 6Case26/62 Van Gend en loos[1963] ECR 1, p. 11.
  • 7Joseph H. H. Weiler, The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 20-21, p.22, p. 23, p. 28.
  • 8Case 6/64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585 , p.593.
  • 9[美]约瑟夫·威勒 周弘译.《欧洲宪政》[M].中国社会科学院出版社,2004年版.第22,194页.
  • 10Cases 3/76 etc. Kramer [1976] ECR 1279.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部