摘要
目的探讨眼科术后抗感染用药对于创口愈合的作用。方法2008年7月至2011年7月在我院行眼科手术者60例,随机分为抗感染组和非抗感染组,两组在术后均给于常规对症治疗及护理,其中抗感染组在术后给予抗感染药物,非抗感染组在术后不给于抗感染药物。比较两组患者术后4d、7d手术切口红肿、疼痛、感染及愈合情况。结果两组在术后手术切口均出现不同程度的红肿、疼痛,但抗感染组的红肿、疼痛程度明显比非抗感染组轻,抗感染组的手术切口愈合时间明显比非抗感染组短,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组7d后的总有效率比较,抗感染组疗效优于非抗感染组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论抗感染组的疗效要明显优于非感染组。
Objective To investigate the effect of anti-infection treatment for wound healing process after ophthalmic surgery. Methods 60 of eye surgery patients in our hospital during July 2008 to July 2011 were randomly divided into anti-infection group and non-anti-infection group, they all had the same eommen symptomatic treatment and care,but there was a difference that anti-infection patients were given postoperatively anti-infectives for extra treatment , while non-anti-infection group members did not get the anti-infective therapy after surgery. To compare the two groups by incision redness, pain, infection, and wound heal- ing after 4 days, 7 days of the surgery. Results The postoperative incision of the two groups varied in the degree of redness, pain, infection, but there was an obvious difference between the anti-infective group and the non-anti-infection group for swelling, pain levels and the former was significantly lower than the latter, and the surgical wound healing time of the anti-infective group was shorter than the non-anti-infection group ( P 〈 0.05 ). After treated for 7 days, comparing the efficacy of the two groups, curative effect of the anti-infective group was obvious better than the other with a significant differences ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions The efficacy of anti-infective group is significantly better than non-anti-infective group.
出处
《中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志》
2012年第9期703-705,共3页
Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease
关键词
手术后
眼科
抗感染用药
愈合时间
切口
Surgery, ophthalmic
Medicine, anti-infection
Healing time, wound