期刊文献+

干热河谷4种固氮植物根瘤固氮潜力及其影响因素 被引量:5

Nitrogen-fixation Potential of Nodules in Four Types of Nitrogen-fixation Plants and Their Influencing Factors in Dry-hot Valley
下载PDF
导出
摘要 氮是除水分之外影响干热河谷生物活性的关键因子,豆科植物生物固氮是该地区氮素的重要来源之一。采用乙炔还原法测定了干热河谷不同季节燥红土和变性土林地中大叶相思、新银合欢、木豆和山合欢根瘤固氮酶活性(NAs)。结果表明:新银合欢(16.25μmol.g-1.h-1)和大叶相思(15.85μmol.g-1.h-1)根瘤NAs显著(P<0.001)高于山合欢(9.60μmol.g-1.h-1)和木豆(9.42μmol.g-1.h-1)。雨季根瘤NAs显著高于旱季,约为旱季的2.3倍。燥红土样地上植物根瘤NAs是变性土样地的1.3 1.6倍。研究揭示:除植被类型外,干热河谷植物根瘤NAs主要受土壤类型、季节和土壤含水量的影响,而受土壤温度的影响较小。 In addition to water, Nitrogen (N) is often the key limiting factor for biological activity in Dry-hot Valleys. Biological N-fixation by nitrogen-fixation plants is of important source of N for vegetations in those areas. The nitrogenase activities (NAs) of nodules in Acacia auriliformis A. Cunn, Leucaena leucacephala ( Lam. ) de Wit, Cajanus cajan (L). Millspangh and Albiza kalkora Prain plantations were determined at the Dry red soils and Vertisol spots at four different sampling times in a Dry-hot Valley with the acetylene reduction assay. The results showed that the NAs of nodules in L. leucacephala ( 16.25 μmol·g^-1·h^-1 ) and A. auriliformis ( 15.85 μmol·g^-1·h^-1) were significantly higher than those in A. kalkora (9.60 μmol·g^-1·h^-1 ) and C. cajan (9.42 μmol·g^-1·h^-1). The NAs of nodules in rainy season were significantly higher than those in dry season, and approximated 2.3 times that in dry season. The NAs of nodules at the Dry red soils spots were 1.3 - 1.6 times higher than those at the Vertisol spots. The research revealed besides plant type, the NAs of nodules were primarily affected by soil type, season and soil water content, but less affected by soil temperature.
出处 《林业科学研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期432-437,共6页 Forest Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(31100462) 中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所基本科研业务专项(riricaf201001M) 林业公益性行业专项(201104002-3-2)
关键词 固氮酶活性 根瘤 土壤类型 季节动态 干热河谷 Nitrogenase activity nodule soil type season pattern Dry-hot Valley
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Wilfred M P, John P, Zinke P J, et al. Global patterns of soil nitro- gen storage [J]. Nature, 1985, 317:613-616.
  • 2Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security [ J]. Science, 2004, 304:1623 - 1627.
  • 3Steven G W. Repairing damaged wildlands: A process-orientated, landscape-scale approach [ M ]. Cambridge University Press. Cam- bridge, United Kingdom. Fifth printing, 2005 : 1 - 23.
  • 4何毓蓉,黄成敏,杨忠,张信宝.云南省元谋干热河谷的土壤退化及旱地农业研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(1):56-60. 被引量:35
  • 5赵琳,郎南军,郑科,郭玉红,张立新,江期川,温绍龙,郭永清.云南干热河谷退化生态系统植被恢复影响因子的特征分析[J].西部林业科学,2009,38(3):39-44. 被引量:8
  • 6张鹏,李新荣,贾荣亮,胡宜刚,黄磊.沙坡头地区生物土壤结皮的固氮活性及其对水热因子的响应[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(9):906-913. 被引量:16
  • 7Schwintzer C R, Berry A M, Disney L D, et al. Seasonal patterns of root nodule growth, endophyte morphology, nitrogenase activity, and shoot development in Myrica gale[ J ]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1982, 60:746-757.
  • 8Zhang F, Dashti N, Hynes R K, et al. Plant growth promoting rhi- zobacteria and soybean [ Glycine max ( L. ) Merr. ] nodulation and nitrogen fixation at suboptimal mot zone temperatures [ J ]. Annals of Botany, 1996, 77(5) : 453 -459.
  • 9黄维南,黄志宏,林清洪,章宁,蔡克强,邹小鲁.气候因子对三种豆科树种固氮的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(5):455-458. 被引量:1
  • 10Lurline E M, Raymond B, Dyremple B M, et al. Temperature effects on Bradyrhizobium spp. growth and symbiotic effectiveness with pigeonpea and cowpea [ J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2006, 29(2) : 331 -346.

二级参考文献120

共引文献121

同被引文献87

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部