摘要
目的对北京市实习护生的自我效能感进行调查,探讨临床实习护生自我效能感与带教方法的相关性。方法采用方便抽样的方法,应用一般自我效能感量表和带教方法调查表,对北京市某三甲医院200名实习护生进行调查。结果共发放调查问卷200份,回收有效问卷200份,有效回收率100%,200名实习护生一般自我效能感处于中等偏上水平,21~40分者175名(87.5%);12.5%的实习护生自我效能感偏低。自我效能感得分不同的实习护生选择临床带教方法存在区别,自我效能感得分在31~40分的实习护生多选择规范流程带教法(占所属程度人数的50.00%);自我效能感得分在21—30分的实习护生多选择PBL(problem—basedlearning)带教法(占所属程度人数的62.07%);自我效能感得分在11—20分和1~10分的实习护生多选择临床讲解带教法(占各自所属程度人数的50.00%和100.00%)。采用却eo珊on方法对自我效能感与带教方法进行相关分析,结果表明,两者呈显著相关(r=0.794,P〈0.05)。结论应重视实习护生自我效能感的评定,针对不同自我效能感的实习护生采用不同的带教方法,以提高临床实习的效果。
Objective To investigate the self-efficacy of student nurses in Beijing, and explore the relationship between their self-efficacy and teaching methods. Methods Convenience sampling, General Self- efficacy Scale (GSES) and the questionnaire about teaching methods were used to investigate and analyze 200 student nurses in a third-grade class - A hospital in Beijing in January 2012. Results The general self-efficacy of 200 student nurses was on a higher-middle level. There were 175 student nurses scored 21 to 40, which accounted for 87.5%, and the rest 12.5% felt less self-efficacy. Student nurses who scored differently in GSES chose different chnical teaching methods. 50% of those who scored 31 to 40 preferred standardize process teaching method. 62.07% of those who scored 21 to 30 preferred problem based learning (PBL) teaching method. 50% of those who scored 11 to 20 and 100% of those who scored 1 to 10 preferred clinical explanation teaching method. The relationship between self-efficacy and teaching methods was analyzed by Spearmen method and was significantly correlated ( r = 0.794, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions More attention should be paid to the self- efficacy of student nurses. Different teaching methods should be used toward student nurses with different levels of self-efficacy in order to improve the effect of clinical practice.
出处
《中华现代护理杂志》
2012年第22期2619-2622,共4页
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing