期刊文献+

20世纪以来《后出师表》真伪论争述评 被引量:1

Review on the Controversy on the Genuineness of the Later Memorial on Dispatching the Army since the 20^(th) Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《后出师表》是研究诸葛亮的重要材料。自清代开始,《后出师表》的真伪成了学者们争论不休的话题。针对这一问题分别有正反两种观点。综合20世纪以来前人的研究成果,搜集关于证明《后出师表》真伪的各种依据。针对同一个论争点,学界分别有支持和反对两种观点。分别列出不同论争点的正反两种观点,总结陈述并细致分析这些观点。最后根据不同的论争点如《后出师表》的出处问题、感情基调与用语问题、涉及的历史人物等提出自己的观点,即《后出师表》确实出自诸葛亮之手。 The Later Memorial on Dispatching the Army, which has aroused a lot of controversy since the Qing Dynasty, is the most important material to study Zhuge Liang. The academic world holds different views on this issue. Some scholars think it is not Zhuge Liang's work, while the others approve its genuineness, and both sides provide much evidence for their argument. In this paper, the author collects, reviews and analyzes carefully the evidences from both the supporters and the opponents since the 20th century and finally comes to the conclusion that Zhuge Liang is indeed the author of the Later Memorial on Dispatching the Army based on the study of its origin, emotional tone, language use and historical figures concerned.
作者 刘莉莉
出处 《金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第2期56-60,共5页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 《后出师表》 真伪论争 述评 非伪作 诸葛亮 《三国志》 The Later Memorial on Dispatching the Army argument over genuineness controversy review Zhuge Liang History of Three Kingdoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1陈寿,裴松之.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
  • 2黄瑞云.《后出师表》非诸葛亮所作[J].职大学报,2008(2). 被引量:2
  • 3庞怀靖.论《后出师表》非伪作[J].人文杂志,1983(2):104-107. 被引量:1
  • 4贯井正.论《后出师表》应系诸葛亮所作[J].晋阳学刊,2001(2):66-71.
  • 5互动百科.后出师表[EB/OL].(2012-05-11)[2012-05-21].http://www.hudong.com/wiki.
  • 6浩学历史网.世传诸葛亮出师表辩证[EB/OL].(2007-11-08)[2012-05-20].http://www.hxlsw.com/history/sanguo/zt/.
  • 7韩非.韩非子[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
  • 8中华书局编委会.曹操集[M].北京:中华书局,1974:17.

共引文献15

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部