摘要
目的评价两种椎管内麻醉方法用于剖宫产手术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院收治的400例行剖宫产术的孕产妇临床资料,比较腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉方法(CSEA)与单纯的持续硬膜外麻醉方法(CEA)的效果。结果 CSEA组的麻醉显效时间明显小于CEA组,肌松满意度优于CEA组,且麻醉10 min后低血压例数明显低于CEA组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)充分发挥了硬膜外麻醉和腰麻的优势,大大提高了剖宫产的麻醉效果和患者的生活质量,值得向临床推荐。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two spinal anesthesia method in Uterine-incision Delivery.Methods Analyze the clinical data of 400 pregnant women with cesarean and compare the efficacy between CSEA and CEA.Results The index such as Onset time,muscle relaxants satisfaction and hypotension number of cases in CSEA group were better than CEA group,and differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion CSEA can greatly increase patient＇s life quality and may be regarded as the ideal method of anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2012年第22期51-52,共2页
China Practical Medicine
关键词
腰硬联合麻醉
持续硬膜外麻醉
剖宫产术
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
Continuous epidural anesthesia
Uterine-incision Delivery
