期刊文献+

基于明考夫斯基距离的冲突证据合成方法

Conflict evidence DS combination method research based on Minkowski distance
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了一种新的证据预处理的冲突证据合成方法.融合系统中各证据的重要程度可能不同,直接利用公式合成可能得到与实际相悖的结论.利用明考夫斯基距离,根据系数的不同分别得到绝对距离、欧式距离和切比雪夫距离,三个距离表示有一定差异,通过融合三个距离得到证据距离,从而可以较准确表示证据的关系.利用证据距离进一步转化为表示证据权重的权值,利用权值对证据进行预处理,从而可以把冲突证据的合成问题进行转化,再通过改进的合成公式,对预处理后的证据进行合成,得到合成结果.最后通过同其它算法的算例比较,说明新方法的在合成冲突证据的方面的优越性. One novel conflict evidence combination method based on evidence pretreatment was studied. The importance degree of the evidence were different, the directly combination conclusion of them may be opposed to the real. According to the different coefficients of Minkowski distance, absolute distance, Euclidean distance and Chebyshev distance were obtained, which have certain differences. The evidence distance was obtained through integration of the three distances, and represents a more accurate evidence relationship. Evidence distance was further changed into the weight which reflects the importance of evi- dence. According to weight, the basic probabilities were reallocated, and then were used to get the final combination result by the improved combination method. The superiority of the new method is shown by the different algorithms comparison example.
出处 《四川大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期790-794,共5页 Journal of Sichuan University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(61079022)
关键词 数据融合 证据合成 明考夫斯基 证据距离 权值 data fusion, evidence combination, Minkowski, evidence distance, weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Denoux T. Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by non distinct bodies of evidence[J].Artificial Intelligence, 2008, 172 (2/ 3) : 234.
  • 2Yager R R. Comparing approximate reasoning andprobabilistic reasoning using the Dempster-Shafer framework[J-]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2009, 50(5): 812.
  • 3关欣,衣晓,孙晓明,何友.有效处理冲突证据的融合方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2009(1):138-141. 被引量:20
  • 4Yang J, Sen P. A general multi level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, 2006, 36 (10): 1458.
  • 5刘海燕,赵宗贵,刘熹.D-S证据理论中冲突证据的合成方法[J].电子科技大学学报,2008,37(5):701-704. 被引量:76
  • 6Zeng D H, Xu J M, Xu G. Data fusion for traffic in- cident detection using D-S evidence theory with prob- abilistic SVMs[J]. Journal of Computers, 2008, 3 (10) : 36.
  • 7Wu W Z. Attribute reduction based on evidence theo- ry in incomplete decision systemsI-J]. InformationSciences, 2008, 178(5)~ 1355.
  • 8Yager R R. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules [J]. Information Sciences, 1987, 41(2): 93.
  • 9李弼程,王波,魏俊,钱曾波,黄玉琪.一种有效的证据理论合成公式[J].数据采集与处理,2002,17(1):33-36. 被引量:203
  • 10Murphy C. Combining belief functions when evi- denee eonfliets [J ]. Deeision Support Systems, 2000, 29(7): 1.

二级参考文献46

共引文献588

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部