期刊文献+

焊管常用探伤方法及技术 被引量:4

Commonly-used NDT Methods and Techniques for Weld Pipes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了焊管常用的3种探伤方法(漏磁探伤、涡流探伤和超声波探伤)及技术。分析了3种探伤方法的优缺点:漏磁探伤灵敏度高,能很好地分辨出焊管内外壁缺陷,但长管体、大壁厚管在漏磁探伤后需做消磁处理;涡流探伤检测速度快,但受趋肤效应的限制,很难发现工件深处的缺陷;超声波探伤穿透能力强、缺陷定位准确、成本低、速度快,但探伤操作需经耦合,在北方严冬环境下耦合时焊管易冻结,给探伤作业带来不便。 Described in the paper are the three commonly-used NDT methods and techniques for weld pipe flaw inspection, i.e., the MFL detection, the eddy-current detection and the ultrasonic detection. Also analyzed are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. The MFL method features high sensitivity which ensures satisfactory identification of both outer and inner flaws of the pipe, but in case of long large-sized heavy-wall pipe, demagnetization is necessary to be carried out upon ending of the detection. As for the eddy-current method, although the detection speed is rather high, it is so difficult to find out any flaw located deep in the workpiece due to the Kelvin skin effect. And speaking of the ultrasonic method, the advantages are high penetrating force, high flaw-positioning accuracy, low operation cost, and high detection velocity, but medium coupling is needed for the detection, which may cause, in winter, the trouble of freezing of the pipe, particularly in hi- latitude areas, thus make it rather difficult to keep the detection operation going smoothly.
作者 曹雷
出处 《钢管》 CAS 2012年第4期72-74,共3页 Steel Pipe
关键词 焊管检测 漏磁探伤 涡流探伤 超声波探伤 Weld pipe detection Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection Eddy-current detection Ultrasonic detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1杨理践,马凤铭,高松巍.管道漏磁在线检测系统的研究[J].仪器仪表学报,2004,25(z1):1052-1054. 被引量:15
  • 2李光海,刘时风,沈功田.压力容器无损检测——漏磁检测技术[J].无损检测,2004,26(12):638-642. 被引量:34
  • 3马凤铭,杨理践.高速漏磁检测中的速度效应及信号补偿[J].无损探伤,2005,29(3):12-15. 被引量:9
  • 4崔伟,黄松岭,赵伟.传感器提离值对管道漏磁检测的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(1):21-24. 被引量:34
  • 5[3]Ichizo UETAKE. Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Method.非破坏检查,1994,43(10):621~628.
  • 6[4]Jansen H J M. Magnetization as A Key Parameter of Magnetic Flux Leakage Pig for Pipeline Inspection. Insight,1994,36(9):672~676.
  • 7[5]Palanisamy R. On the Accuracy of A.C.Flux Leakage, Eddy Current, EMAT and Ultrasonic Method of Measuring Surface Flaws in Seamless Steel Tubing. Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, 1986,(5A):215~223.
  • 8Teitsma A. Pipeline inspection by intelligent high resolution and conventional magnetic flux leakage pigs [A]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pipeline Reliability[C]. Calgary,Alberta:1992.
  • 9Dwards CE, Palmer SB. The magnetic leakage field of surface breaking cracks[J]. J Phys D: Apply Phys,1986,19(4): 657-673.
  • 10Foerster F. New findings in the field of nondestructive magnetic leakage field inspection[J]. NDT international,1986,19(1) :3-14.

共引文献48

同被引文献29

  • 1孔诚.曲面焊缝超声波串列式探伤方法探讨[J].无损探伤,2004,28(3):19-22. 被引量:2
  • 2张贤俊.焊缝超声串列扫查法探伤及缺陷定位[J].无损探伤,1993(3):44-45. 被引量:2
  • 3史亦伟.超声检测[M].北京:机械出版社,2005.
  • 4李家伟,陈积懋.无损检测手册[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2001.
  • 5中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T9711-2011石油天然气工业管线输送系统用钢管[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
  • 6美国石油学会.APISpec5L管线管规范[s].44版.北京:石油工业标准化研究所,2007.
  • 7Det Norske Veritas. DNV OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]. 2007.
  • 8Shell Group of Companies. DEP 31.40.20.37-Gen Line pipe for critical service(amendments/supplements to ISO 3183: 2007)[S].2011. ISO 3183:2007.
  • 9Petroleum and natural gas industries- steel pipe for pipeline transportation systems[S]. 2007.
  • 10《轧钢新技术3000问》编辑委员会.轧钢新技术3000问:管材分册[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2005.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部