期刊文献+

台湾地区30~59岁健康体检人群肥胖5年发病风险预测模型 被引量:5

Estimation on the risk of 5-years obesity development among adults aged 30-59, based on the Taiwan MJ Health-checkup Database
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建台湾地区30~59岁健康体检人群肥胖5年发病风险(个体化)预测模型。方法选择1998--2006年首次参加台湾美兆健康体检的30~59岁人群15085人,剔除基线患肥胖者918人共计14167人。将4个体检中心分为建模队列(台北中心,n=8104)和验证队列(另3个中心,n=6063)。按建模队列5年后是否发生肥胖为因变量、基线指标为自变量进行单变量分析,并建立多元逐步logistic回归模型,以ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为判定预测模型拟合优度的主要指标,用验证队列对模型的外部效度进行评估。建模后再将人群预测风险概率正态化转为可实际应用操作的4个风险等级。结果4个体检中心基线时正常体重、超重和肥胖人群的比例分别为50.00%~60.00%、26.47%-31.11%和5.76%-7.24%。剔除基线患者后,全部受检者5年肥胖发病率为2.73%(386/14167),4个中心肥胖发病率为2.66%-2.91%。多变量logistic回归构建的预测模型包括年龄、性别、糖尿病家族史、近3个月体重变化≥4kg和腰围5个指标。建模队列建立的预测模型AUC约为O.898(95%CI:0.884~0.912),验证队列外部效度验证结果为AUC=0.881(95%CI:0.862,0.900)。将建模队列划分为4个风险等级后,显示中危(16.0%)和高危(2.9%)的个体5年内发生肥胖的危险分别比一般人群高7.8倍和16.6倍。结论利用台湾美兆健康体检纵向数据资料建立的肥胖5年个体风险预测模型,其效度和信度均较高,且评价标准简单实用,无论对个体自身肥胖风险评价还是对社区人群肥胖监测均具有应用价值。 Objective This study aimed to provide an epidemiological modeling in evaluating the risk of developing obesity within 5 years in Taiwan population aged 30-59 years. Methods After excluding 918 individuals who were obesitive at baseline, a cohort of 14 167 non-obesity subjects aged 30-59 years in the initial year during 1998-2006, was formed to derive a Risk Score which could predict the incident obesity (IO). Multivariate logistic regression was used to derive the risk functions, using the check-up center (Taipei training cohort, n----8104) of the overall cohort. Rules based on these risk functions were evaluated in the left three centers (testing cohort, n= 6063). Risk functions were produced to detect the IO on a training sample using the multivariate logistic regression models. Starting with variables that could predict the IO through univariate models, we constructed multivariable logistic regression models in a stepwise manner which eventually could include all the variables. We evaluated the predictability of the model by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and to testify its diagnostic property on the testing sample. Once the final model was defined, the next step was to establish rules to characterize 4 different degrees of risk based on the cut points of these probabilities after transforming into normal distribution by log-transformation. Results At baseline.the range of the oronortion of normal weight.overweight and obesity were 50.00%-60.00% , 26.47%-31.11% and 5.76%-7.24% respectively in four check-up centers of Taiwan. After excluding 918 obesity individuals at baseline, we ascertained 386 (2.73%, 386/14 167) cases having IO and 2.66%-2.91% of them having centered obesity in the four check-up centers respectively. Final multivariable logistic regression model would include five risk factors: sex, age, history of diabetes, weight deduction 〉~4 kg within 3 months and waist circumference. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.898 (95%CI, 0.884-0.912) that could predict the development of obesity within 5 years. The curve also had adequate performance in testing the sample fAUC=0.881 (95% CI, 0.862-0.900) ]. After labeling the four risk degrees, 16.0% and 2.9% of the total subjects were in the mediate and high risk populations respectively and were 7.8 and 16.6 times higher, when comparing with the population at risk in general. Conclusion The predictability and reliability of our obesity risk score model, derived based on Taiwan MJ Longitudinal Health-checkup-based Population Database, were relatively satisfactory, with its simple and practicable predictive variables and the risk degree form. This model could help individuals to self assess the situation of risk on obesity and could also guide the community caretakers to monitor the trend of obesity development.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期921-925,共5页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
关键词 肥胖 风险预测模型 纵向数据 Obesity Risk predictive model Longitudinal data
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Lorig K, Ritter PL, Plant K, et al. The South Australia Health Chronic Disease Self-Management Intemet Trial. Health Educ Behav,2012.
  • 2EEpub ahead of print] Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med, 2006,355 (8) : 763-778.
  • 3Vasan RS, Pencina M J, Cobain M, et al. Estimated risks for developing obesity in the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med,2005,143(7) :473-480.
  • 4Bibbins-Domingo K, Coxson P, Pletcher M J, et al. Adolescent overweight and future adult coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med,2007,357(23) : 2371-2379.
  • 5Vazquez G, Duval S, Jacobs DR, et al. Comparison of body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio in predicting incident diabetes: a meta-analysis. Epidemiol Rev, 2007,29 : 115-128.
  • 6Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012,97 (7) : 2482-2488.
  • 7McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Chow WH, et al. Analgesic use andchronic renal failure: a critical review of the epidemiologic literature. Kidney Int, 1998,54 (3) : 679-686.
  • 8St Jeor ST, Brunner RL, Harrington ME, et al. A classification system to evaluate weight maintainers, gainers, and losers. J Am Diet Assoc, 1997,97(5) :481-488.
  • 9吴兆苏,姚崇华,赵冬,吴桂贤,王薇,刘静,曾哲淳,吴英恺,张鸿修,周景春,郭宝霞,冯颖,马隆恩,何厚琦,胡英华,潘信伟,杜福昌,徐修成,胡锡衷,吴宗荣,尹协瑛,陈阳春,张孝慈,杨尔成.我国多省市心血管病趋势及决定因素的人群监测(中国MONICA方案)I.人群危险因素监测结果[J].中华心血管病杂志,1997,25(4):255-259. 被引量:172
  • 10Zhou B, Zhang H, Wu Y, et al. Ecological analysis of the association between incidence and risk factors of coronary heart disease and stroke in Chinese populations. CVD Prey, 1998, 1 (3) :207-216.

二级参考文献30

共引文献6474

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部