摘要
目的探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者不同接诊方法与预后之间的相互关系,旨在提高AMI抢救成功率。方法对该院急诊科2000～2010年出诊院前急救的AMI患者132例(观察组)和同期由家属或同事送来急诊救治的AMI患者136例(对照组)作回顾性对比分析。结果观察组病死率为12.12%,低于对照组的22.79%(χ2=3.89,P<0.05)。结论不同接诊方法对AMI患者预后有差别,院前急救能降低AMI患者病死率。
Objective To explore the relation between different reception methods and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction（AMI） to improve the successful rate of rescue of AMI. Methods One hundred and thirty-two patients with AMI receiving pre-hospital care of the emergency department of our hospital from 2000 -2010 were used as observation group and during the same time 136 patients with AMI who were sent to hospital by family members or colleagues for rescue were used as.the control group. Their clinical data were retrospectively compared and analyzed. Results The mortality rate （ 12. 12% ） of the observation group was lower than that （22. 79% ） of control group （X2 = 3.89,P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion The influence of different reception methods on the prognosis of AMI is different, and pre-hospital care can reduce mortality of AMI.
出处
《中国临床新医学》
2012年第8期768-770,共3页
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词
急性心肌梗死
接诊方法
院前急救
病死率
Acute myocardial infarction（AMI）
Reception method
Pre-hospital care
Mortality rate
